I love space adventures, having grown up on Star Wars and Star Trek, but lately I've found myself interested in the subtle SF and fantasy stories with down-to-Earth settings of the type found in many Ray Bradbury stories, such as the ones in The October Country. Yes, I know Bradbury wrote space adventures too.
If I was asked for a preference between Soft SF and Hard SF, I would choose a middle ground between the two. Stories for me do not have to be scientifically accurate, but I appreciate it when they are, and I roll my eyes when people claim realistic SF would have to be boring.
If I was asked to choose between optimistic technology-is-inherently-good stories (like Star Trek or the works of Asimov) or pessimistic technology-is-inherently-dangerous stories (like Frankenstein or Terminator or the works of Michael Crichton) I would say it depends on my mood. The optimistic stories more closely reflect my worldview, but dystopian post-apocalyptic futures can be lots of fun.
If I was asked to choose between written SF and filmed SF, I would say written, but I have to confess that I am not all that well-read in SF. I'm working on it.