Norrin Radd
Vice Admiral
First of all, I'm not sure about what kind of movie FOX is trying to make.
But knowing their reputation for making lame-ass, cut-to-pieces adaptations that they dumb-down for the willfully unsophisticated masses...it wouldn't surprise me if they were trying to do just the same with Wolverine, especially given the rumours of rifts between the studio and director Gavin Hood.
Or not. Because now they're apparently reshooting a lot of it. Since the shoots are being done by Gavin Hood, maybe they are trying to do right by this movie.
I personally just don't get it. I mean, last year's HUGE hit, The Dark Knight, was intelligent..dark...and utterly intense (if not overly violent). It's a movie about a popular comic book character that was a hit with critics and raked in almost a billion dollars.
Obviously not all movies have to be, or should be, like TDK, but "dark and intense" basically sums up the character of Wolverine perfectly (except I'd also include overly violent in his case). So, why would Fox not get a clue from that and make a DECENT Wolverine flick? I mean, what exactly is there to debate here?
http://movies.ign.com/articles/945/945726p1.html
But knowing their reputation for making lame-ass, cut-to-pieces adaptations that they dumb-down for the willfully unsophisticated masses...it wouldn't surprise me if they were trying to do just the same with Wolverine, especially given the rumours of rifts between the studio and director Gavin Hood.
Or not. Because now they're apparently reshooting a lot of it. Since the shoots are being done by Gavin Hood, maybe they are trying to do right by this movie.
I personally just don't get it. I mean, last year's HUGE hit, The Dark Knight, was intelligent..dark...and utterly intense (if not overly violent). It's a movie about a popular comic book character that was a hit with critics and raked in almost a billion dollars.
Obviously not all movies have to be, or should be, like TDK, but "dark and intense" basically sums up the character of Wolverine perfectly (except I'd also include overly violent in his case). So, why would Fox not get a clue from that and make a DECENT Wolverine flick? I mean, what exactly is there to debate here?
http://movies.ign.com/articles/945/945726p1.html