Will These Actors Return for Fourth Movie?
- Thread starter Gsam
- Start date
Isn't the rumor that Quinto said he is done after the third?
I mean it could obviously still be false, or just a ploy to get more money (and obviously most everyone would get a raise).
I mean it could obviously still be false, or just a ploy to get more money (and obviously most everyone would get a raise).
Which would require a much more solid box office return than what Into Darkness is currently bringing in.
Seems a bit early to worry about the fourth movie since we don't even know when the third is coming out. Isn't this something we should be fretting about in, say, 2018 or so?
Speculating is a fan's business -- no, his duty. And there's no better speculation than far-future speculation ! Hence: science-fiction.
It's possible but those actors who are not trekkies and whose stars are rising may not feel the need. I think the 5-year mission is a great excuse for an animated series. I'd say that's more likely than a fourth movie at this point but yeah, it's too early to be sure.
You think ? I hope not. Once every 40 years seems good.
Not the way things are going, anyway. The box office suggests that the viewers for this movie are pretty much the same from the last one. Those numbers aren't strong enough to justify a series based on that.
If there was a good Trek show out right now it'd make a lot of money and get a lot of viewers, even Enterprise initially had a strong number before the pilot was complete and utter shit (along with the show for four seasons).
As for a fourth movie, it really depends where they are in their careers. Chris Pine isn't exactly a mega star, and Zoe Saldana is probably the most successful of them. The problem is they are contracted to three, so once you get to the fourth they can demand more money and the returns just may not be worth it.
As for a fourth movie, it really depends where they are in their careers. Chris Pine isn't exactly a mega star, and Zoe Saldana is probably the most successful of them. The problem is they are contracted to three, so once you get to the fourth they can demand more money and the returns just may not be worth it.
I admit the first two seasons were pretty mediocre, but seasons 3-4 were very good in my opinion.
You think ? I hope not. Once every 40 years seems good.
Not the way things are going, anyway. The box office suggests that the viewers for this movie are pretty much the same from the last one. Those numbers aren't strong enough to justify a series based on that.
I think they can work out an arrangement with Syfy or USA or something like that. Dedicated enough audience for those channels and Star Trek is a proven name that will draw at least 3 million with even mediocre seasons while it will definitely premier to over 10 million.
The question is, do they want to go for state of the art graphics or are they happy basically going with older and cheaper tech? I think if they don't go for state of the art, it's an easy choice to make the series.
I imagine they all will. It's pretty rare that a studio can't get an actor back for a role like that.
i remember reading somewhere that chris pine recently signed on to do a fourth. then again it could be just rumor and speculation.
Good - he's terrible in the part.
So Spock does not show emotions, except when he does, which is MOST OF THE FILM. Either that or he's perpetually pissed off.
And Romulans have Neanderthal brows, not Vulcans!
Lt. Cheka Wey
Commander
As far as movies go 3 would be enough for me from this cast. Maybe a TV series would be nice if they would partcicipate, but 3 would be nice enough. Tehy could die at the end for all i care.
Trek is univrse, it's about ideas and adventure not a cast.
Trek is univrse, it's about ideas and adventure not a cast.
