MacFarlane said he prefers to have the characters using shuttles to leave the ship. Therefore, there was no need for transporters.I was just curious why they pretty much cloned the show but left out transporters?
That assumption is the same mistake professional critics made. It was never a parody. While it takes a few digs at Trek, that's not the goal.The Orville started out as a parody in my opinion
That assumption is the same mistake professional critics made. It was never a parody.
It's not an assumption, it's my opinion, as I stated
Opinions can be just as wrong as assumptions.
Opinions can be based on fact, or they can be rubbish. Everyone has the right to express an opinion but all opinions are not equal.Opinions are only wrong to those who don't share them.
Charlize Theron's character, from the future, had transporter tech on the Orville. The aliens from the human Zoo episode used transporter to steal Ed and Kelly.View attachment 7941
I don't want to see transporters any more than I want to see a fucking Prime Directive. Let Star Trek keep that story-killing shit.
Charlize Theron's character, from the future, had transporter tech on the Orville. The aliens from the human Zoo episode used transporter to steal Ed and Kelly.
Last Week, in All the World is Birthday Cake... That there was a Prime Directive episode plain and simple.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.