I keep reading from these so-called Star Trek purists, and even in regular reviews of the new Star Trek movie that Nero is a villain who is considered weak by many.
I have absolutely no idea why. Explain to me why I would "feel" for Kahn? The guy tore apart our favorite Captains ship in Space Seed and then held Kirk and co. hostage. So because his new wife dies while on ceti alpha 5 that is supposed to make me feel like he really got the raw end of the stick when in reality it was his actions that got him banished to that planet to begin with. Wake up people, Kahn was not someone who deserved pity points. Not in the least.
Whereas Nero is considered someone you would feel less for, even though you know his background was from working in a blue collar field, supporting a wife and almost newborn child, only to see them get killed because his government, and the Vulcan government, and Spock prime failed to destory the star in time. I can relate to that kind of rage as long as the person was a good doer before they went nutty over everything that ensued.
Someone posted that Chang was a better villian lol. Are you kidding me? What because he quoted shakespeare so well? Give me a break, we got no backstory on Chang, none, notta, zip. All we knew was that he was an admirer of Captain Kirk's fellow warrior status. Or some have said the Borg queen was better? Huh? Right I loved that whole motivation of her trying to get into Data's pants. Not sure if that was creepy in a villain sort of way or downright gross. Sure did make a great villain alright
In all seriousness she wasn't bad, but to say she was superior to Nero is a little wacky in my opinion.
Nero/Eric Bana gave me a villain that looked menacing from the first scene of the movie. I've never been creeped out by someone in a film who merely sits in a chair and stares in the opposite direction as the person addressing them. He managed to do that to me. His accent and interesting way his mouth pronounced and screamed at different things. His intensity while tortoring Capt. Pike was first rate acting, and well enough in character describing why he was so pissed off to begin with. So we got a solid backstory as to why Nero had the motivations he did. People argue that he shouldn't be mad at Spock, but when something bad happens to your family, the rage that ensues usually ensures all bets are off at thinking "rational" for a certain period of time and that is when your looking to place blame against the easiest person to place blame on.
So yeh, I rate Nero's character as one of the better villains in Star Trek history. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to cut down the greatness of Kahn, but when I read people arguing they "felt" something for Kahn, I think they outta go back and rewatch space seed and realize the guy was a total douche from day 1 in terms of his motivations
Lastly, I think alot of people are forgetting that one main reason Nero had to wait for Spock Primes appearance was-- RED MATTER. Spock had it in his ship, Nero didn't. It's just that simple. He wouldn't have been able to go destroy Vulcan without it.
Lay off Nero already!! He was a cool villain to add to Trek lore.
I have absolutely no idea why. Explain to me why I would "feel" for Kahn? The guy tore apart our favorite Captains ship in Space Seed and then held Kirk and co. hostage. So because his new wife dies while on ceti alpha 5 that is supposed to make me feel like he really got the raw end of the stick when in reality it was his actions that got him banished to that planet to begin with. Wake up people, Kahn was not someone who deserved pity points. Not in the least.
Whereas Nero is considered someone you would feel less for, even though you know his background was from working in a blue collar field, supporting a wife and almost newborn child, only to see them get killed because his government, and the Vulcan government, and Spock prime failed to destory the star in time. I can relate to that kind of rage as long as the person was a good doer before they went nutty over everything that ensued.
Someone posted that Chang was a better villian lol. Are you kidding me? What because he quoted shakespeare so well? Give me a break, we got no backstory on Chang, none, notta, zip. All we knew was that he was an admirer of Captain Kirk's fellow warrior status. Or some have said the Borg queen was better? Huh? Right I loved that whole motivation of her trying to get into Data's pants. Not sure if that was creepy in a villain sort of way or downright gross. Sure did make a great villain alright

Nero/Eric Bana gave me a villain that looked menacing from the first scene of the movie. I've never been creeped out by someone in a film who merely sits in a chair and stares in the opposite direction as the person addressing them. He managed to do that to me. His accent and interesting way his mouth pronounced and screamed at different things. His intensity while tortoring Capt. Pike was first rate acting, and well enough in character describing why he was so pissed off to begin with. So we got a solid backstory as to why Nero had the motivations he did. People argue that he shouldn't be mad at Spock, but when something bad happens to your family, the rage that ensues usually ensures all bets are off at thinking "rational" for a certain period of time and that is when your looking to place blame against the easiest person to place blame on.
So yeh, I rate Nero's character as one of the better villains in Star Trek history. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to cut down the greatness of Kahn, but when I read people arguing they "felt" something for Kahn, I think they outta go back and rewatch space seed and realize the guy was a total douche from day 1 in terms of his motivations

Lastly, I think alot of people are forgetting that one main reason Nero had to wait for Spock Primes appearance was-- RED MATTER. Spock had it in his ship, Nero didn't. It's just that simple. He wouldn't have been able to go destroy Vulcan without it.
Lay off Nero already!! He was a cool villain to add to Trek lore.