Really? I think he looks worse!
Or maybe it's just because the last time I saw him was before HD...so ya know, I couldn't see all his little "logic creases" in his face.
Could it be because he's invigorated by the new blood on trek?
RAMA![]()
Could it be because he's invigorated by the new blood on trek?
RAMA![]()
I'm with you..we are talking about the vulcan with Amanda right? I assume that is him...and if it is, he looks totally different to me. I didn't even think it was nimoy
Rob
Could it be because he's invigorated by the new blood on trek?
RAMA![]()
I'm with you..we are talking about the vulcan with Amanda right? I assume that is him...and if it is, he looks totally different to me. I didn't even think it was nimoy
Rob
Could it be because he's invigorated by the new blood on trek?
RAMA![]()
I'm with you..we are talking about the vulcan with Amanda right? I assume that is him...and if it is, he looks totally different to me. I didn't even think it was nimoy
Rob
That's because it's not Nimoy. It's Sarek.Could it be because he's invigorated by the new blood on trek?
RAMA![]()
I'm with you..we are talking about the vulcan with Amanda right? I assume that is him...and if it is, he looks totally different to me. I didn't even think it was nimoy
Rob
That's Ben Cross as Sarek. There was a new shot integrated into the trailer with Spock saluting "Live Long and Prosper." In that shot he looks older. He looks like he aged about 20 human years since Unification, which must make up for Spock and Sarek not aging a day between Star Trek VI and Unification (in Berman-era Trek they really seem to have exaggerated the Vulcans-live-longer-than-humans thread by not aging any Vulcan much once they reach adulthood, though obviously in the real world of course Lenard and Nimoy shot their scenes for both productions within a year of each other.).Could it be because he's invigorated by the new blood on trek?
RAMA![]()
I'm with you..we are talking about the vulcan with Amanda right? I assume that is him...and if it is, he looks totally different to me. I didn't even think it was nimoy
Rob
Except that the rate of aging was inconsistent, and seemed to parallel Sarek's aging process. Both of them seemed to age 20 human years between TOS and the later movies, then they didn't age at all until TNG. In the years since TNG Spock appears to have aged at a much quicker rate again. I guess Sarek had some genetic abnormalities. I can only guess that with Sarek it's better explained that he's just a generation older than Spock so his aging isn't quite as pronounced, though I'd think his disease would have aged him quite a bit. Also, I think that for Spock diplomacy must have seemed far less stressful than his career in Starfleet or his attempts at unification on Romulus.Any aging issues with Spock the character can be explained at least in part by his half-human DNA and lineage. Chronologically, Spock was only 62 or 63 years old in THE UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY but looked a bit older and much more haggard...especially when you consider that Tuvok on VOYAGER was 109 years old at the time of the 24th century events in "Flashback" but looked closer to thirty or forty.Tuvok was a full-blooded Vulcan(so far as anyone ever knew) while Spock wasn't. Hence he aged more like a Terran than most Vulcans.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.