Where does the BS end?

[think]

So when the burning question is lost on a even stranger tangents to the matter or the new realities or fake realities there-of be and become of - but ,,, where does the BS end.,,?

It is here think can be the master of BS but within real tangible thought-out developed and co-created effects of what gives.

BS degree yep there are the real ones and then there are the BS artists K I know I am an artist of all types meaning textures and effects as BS is half the worth of what quality non-sense means. right?

Still just wait, maybe they actually think all this is real , lets see the fingers attached to the arm et, c... nope, not real or unreal there is no matter at hand actualized ,, un-actualized or there betweens.

Again I know half this board ,, the half with the actual BS is totally anal about this grammar thing well go fish. look at the details as that this is what meaning makes out of your anal grammarantics ,

ok phew i have not cursed yet phew

Let us see, what does the idea that someone knows the meaning of presence and would like to or if they can might express this better?

 

[ShamelessMcBundy]

Lolwhut?

 

[judge alba]

it arrives Tuesday

 

[SiorX]

 

[ShamelessMcBundy]

it arrives Tuesday

Along with the photon torpedoes?

 

[Jadzia]

Let us see, what does the idea that someone knows the meaning of presence and would like to or if they can might express this better?

Descartes had burning questions too. He realised he could doubt things. He come to doubt everything around him, in fact even his own fingers and arms, like you.

For Descartes, it was a question of what exists? not just what is present.

So when the burning question is lost on a even stranger tangents to the matter or the new realities or fake realities there-of be and become of - but ,,, where does the BS end.,,?

The BS ends when you realise that you (a thing that thinks) exists. You must exist in order to hold that thought. That is the one thing that Descartes could not doubt, and neither can you.

You think, therefore you are.

 

[think]

ok here is the basic Information from My "public" facebook account ,,,

Sex:MaleCurrent
City:New Brunswick, NJ
Birthdayecember 2, 1963
Hometown:beyond the outer limits of the twilight zone, Nowhere, OK
Siblings:Mark Newbold
Interested In:Women
Looking For:Friendship
Dating
A Relationship
Networking
Political Views:food not guns
Religious Views:forbidden knowledge
Likes and Interests

Activities:loving the idea of loving, Making Movies love thy self always
Interests:emotion formations in theoretical expressions of light and sound, bugs that make weird noises while they copulate, music, tv, movies, books
Favorite Music:Not applicable
Favorite TV Shows:don't watch tv rots mind
Favorite Movies:trek 11
Favorite Books:mine
Favorite Quotations:I think therefore I know; I know therefore I become; I become therefore I am; I am therefore I exist; I exist therefore I am real; I am real therefore I am realized by myself; if this were actually working then this is not real just actualized and I do not think therefore I do not know; I do not know therefore I can not become; I can not become therefore I am not; I am not therefore I do not exist; I do not exist therefore I am not real; I am not real therefore I can not be realized; I am not realized therefore I have not been actualized; but in actuality it does not matter what is realized anymore than what is not realized? but yet when do the numbers stop counting out my statements? when do I stop making statements...
2/7/05 edit => 10-13-09
About Me:more or less unreal by now., yet still of being.

really I am "UP" on Descartes Jadzia and it is good to see you posting to me in my delirium as it is

really the thought is: where does the mind body equation have meaning beyond what is ever in it to be known of.

that sentence might get edited but some thingy for now.

 

[The Boy Who Cried Worf]

Let us see, what does the idea that someone knows the meaning of presence and would like to or if they can might express this better?

Descartes had burning questions too. He realised he could doubt things. He come to doubt everything around him, in fact even his own fingers and arms, like you.

For Descartes, it was a question of what exists? not just what is present.

So when the burning question is lost on a even stranger tangents to the matter or the new realities or fake realities there-of be and become of - but ,,, where does the BS end.,,?

The BS ends when you realise that you (a thing that thinks) exists. You must exist in order to hold that thought. That is the one thing that Descartes could not doubt, and neither can you.

You think, therefore you are.

But of course the fallacy in Descartes was that cogito doesn't prove that "sum" exists it just proves that there is a cogito.

 

[RJDiogenes]

BS ends at "Sleeping In Light." Oh, wait, that's B5. Never mind.

The BS ends when you realise that you (a thing that thinks) exists. You must exist in order to hold that thought. That is the one thing that Descartes could not doubt, and neither can you.

You think, therefore you are.

Heh.

 

[Zulu Romeo]

I think, therefore I am..... I think.






(bonus points.... say, 100.... if anyone gets that specific reference)

 

[ITL]

If the first post is any indication, it will never end.

 

[Rii]

Let us see, what does the idea that someone knows the meaning of presence and would like to or if they can might express this better?

Descartes had burning questions too. He realised he could doubt things. He come to doubt everything around him, in fact even his own fingers and arms, like you.

For Descartes, it was a question of what exists? not just what is present.

So when the burning question is lost on a even stranger tangents to the matter or the new realities or fake realities there-of be and become of - but ,,, where does the BS end.,,?

The BS ends when you realise that you (a thing that thinks) exists. You must exist in order to hold that thought. That is the one thing that Descartes could not doubt, and neither can you.

You think, therefore you are.

But of course the fallacy in Descartes was that cogito doesn't prove that "sum" exists it just proves that there is a cogito.

Which is why Descartes went on to argue that God exists and is benevolent, and that being such he wouldn't seek to deceive his creations about their nature, and therefore that the way things appeared to his senses was broadly speaking, how they were.

 

[Jadzia]

really I am "UP" on Descartes Jadzia and it is good to see you posting to me in my delirium as it is

really the thought is: where does the mind body equation have meaning beyond what is ever in it to be known of.

I think you're questioning the meaning of reality beyond the certainty of your own self awareness. Which is quite a solipsist perspective, but still worthy of an answer...

Well some things can cause you pain and distress, and other things can cause you pleasure and comfort, but you're not completely in control of these things. Sometimes you can experience distress against your will, with the distress seemingly brought about by events beyond your own mind.

But realize that you have preferences, that help you to find pleasure and comfort, and help you avoid pain and distress. Preferences help you to navigate those external stimuli.

Without preference there is only BS, as you'd be indifferent to the causes of pleasure and pain, and unable to compare the significance of your experiences to value one over another. While that may appear superficially to be some kind of psychological invulnerability, it really is not. A mind without preferences is just as vulnerable.

 

[RandyS]

BS never ends.

That's why it's called BS.

 

[Pingfah]

I can't tell you where it ends, but I can tell you where it amasses.

 

[CaptainStoner]

The philosopher's shovel.

 

[RandyS]

I can't tell you where it ends, but I can tell you where it amasses.

Washington?

The internet?

Both?

 

[The Boy Who Cried Worf]

Descartes had burning questions too. He realised he could doubt things. He come to doubt everything around him, in fact even his own fingers and arms, like you.

For Descartes, it was a question of what exists? not just what is present.



The BS ends when you realise that you (a thing that thinks) exists. You must exist in order to hold that thought. That is the one thing that Descartes could not doubt, and neither can you.

You think, therefore you are.

But of course the fallacy in Descartes was that cogito doesn't prove that "sum" exists it just proves that there is a cogito.

Which is why Descartes went on to argue that God exists and is benevolent, and that being such he wouldn't seek to deceive his creations about their nature, and therefore that the way things appeared to his senses was broadly speaking, how they were.

Descartes never should have been able to get to that point though. His one undoubtable claim didn't actually say what he thought it did because it implies the existence of something he actually couldn't prove. The phrase "I think therefore I am" really just says "thinking is going on, therefore there is thought"

 

[think]

If the first post is any indication, it will never end.

that is give but how much does one have to put up with .,? and or is that amount of BS related to how much they can stand or not.

The philosopher's shovel.

occam's razor

As we can reinvent the universe over and over by Hacking reality for the finer points in life it is never what is needed in any way shape of form from the original idea of a disciplined creative thoughts.

 

[MNM]

You think, therefore you are.

What if it's only an illusion that you are thinking? Or more acturately, you think you are thinking.