I feel like the writers have been a bit inconsistent on when exactly this happened (and what it even means, for that matter).
In terms of productions, the first clue on this event came in the episode "Yesterday's Enterprise". Of course that episode established the Enterprise-C having sacrificed itself defending Narendra III from the Romulans in 2344. Castillo mentions in the episode that there was a peace treaty being negotiated at the time. The implication in the episode is that the heroism of the "C" crew not only prevented a later war but led to improved relations with the Klingons.
A couple of years later, we had the events of "Star Trek VI", with the Praxis explosion leading to a peace conference at Khitomer in 2293, said to be ending "seventy years of hostility". (Obviously, neither the episode's writers did not foresee this, and the film's writers probably weren't concerned with it fitting neatly with what the episode established).
A few years after that, in "Way of the Warrior", Bashir talks of "two decades of peace". The "Star Trek Chronology" takes this literally, as it often did, and says there was a new era of peace that began around 2352 (though more likely this would be something shortly after Narendra III). Funnily enough, the episode also talks about Gowron withdrawing from the Khitomer Accords (and reinstating them in "By Inferno's Light"), which would seem to imply closer to EIGHT decades, not two.
On top of that, in the episode "Faces", B'Elanna talks about it not being easy growing up because relations with the Klingons weren't so good when she was kid (which was presumably in the 2350's).
So how do you think this all fits together? What did the Khitomer Conference achieve? What was the "peace treaty" being negotiated around the time of Narendra III about?
And what exactly does being "allies" mean, anyway? Some of the early TNG episodes seemed to go so far as to suggest the Klingons had actually JOINED the Federation ("Heart of Glory" implied it with the Fed symbol on a Klingon ship, and "Samaritan Snare" flat out said it) before wisely pulling back.
Is there a difference between merely being at peace and being allies? Is that the difference between the Khitomer treaty and the presumed "post-Narendra III" treaty? What was the "two decades of peace", then? Was there a falling out in between?
Very complicated.
In terms of productions, the first clue on this event came in the episode "Yesterday's Enterprise". Of course that episode established the Enterprise-C having sacrificed itself defending Narendra III from the Romulans in 2344. Castillo mentions in the episode that there was a peace treaty being negotiated at the time. The implication in the episode is that the heroism of the "C" crew not only prevented a later war but led to improved relations with the Klingons.
A couple of years later, we had the events of "Star Trek VI", with the Praxis explosion leading to a peace conference at Khitomer in 2293, said to be ending "seventy years of hostility". (Obviously, neither the episode's writers did not foresee this, and the film's writers probably weren't concerned with it fitting neatly with what the episode established).
A few years after that, in "Way of the Warrior", Bashir talks of "two decades of peace". The "Star Trek Chronology" takes this literally, as it often did, and says there was a new era of peace that began around 2352 (though more likely this would be something shortly after Narendra III). Funnily enough, the episode also talks about Gowron withdrawing from the Khitomer Accords (and reinstating them in "By Inferno's Light"), which would seem to imply closer to EIGHT decades, not two.
On top of that, in the episode "Faces", B'Elanna talks about it not being easy growing up because relations with the Klingons weren't so good when she was kid (which was presumably in the 2350's).
So how do you think this all fits together? What did the Khitomer Conference achieve? What was the "peace treaty" being negotiated around the time of Narendra III about?
And what exactly does being "allies" mean, anyway? Some of the early TNG episodes seemed to go so far as to suggest the Klingons had actually JOINED the Federation ("Heart of Glory" implied it with the Fed symbol on a Klingon ship, and "Samaritan Snare" flat out said it) before wisely pulling back.
Is there a difference between merely being at peace and being allies? Is that the difference between the Khitomer treaty and the presumed "post-Narendra III" treaty? What was the "two decades of peace", then? Was there a falling out in between?
Very complicated.
