Nobody likes criticism, but criticism can be constructive, and everybody comes across something they don't like. If there are authors on here that take offense, I apologise.
Personally, I really didn't like DS9's "Mission Gamma #1: Twilight." The story was okay but I thought the writing was really hard to read. Everything was explained, nothing was left to the imagination.
The slightest hand movements, for example, are needlessly detailed, slowing the pace of the story right down. My English lecturer used to suggest to us to think of words as pounds (or dollars, whatever), and that we should try to spend as little as possible as we write, because superfluous words are just that. Superfluous.
I don't know if I'm allowed to quote from the book, or if that is an infringement on some copyright laws or something, so I'll just say that the author is also always needlessly repeating the same information in chapters, as if feeling the need to always "catch us up." It gets very tiresome after the first few chapters.
And lastly, I know Star Trek is full of heroes, but people have their dark sides too. The entire DS9 cast comes across in this book as being so... perfect. Like they would never ever make a bad decision, do the wrong thing, think too badly about anyone, or hold a grudge. Again, it's really tiresome.
I found the same thing in the Avatar duology. The crews of DS9 and Enterprise got on so well. Every time two characters met for the first time it was like "They didn't know each other, but they instantly felt like they would get along." Main characters from different series are allowed to not get along. It's only natural, and conflict makes for better stories.
Just wanted to get those things out of my system, and see what the general consensus was
Peace.
Personally, I really didn't like DS9's "Mission Gamma #1: Twilight." The story was okay but I thought the writing was really hard to read. Everything was explained, nothing was left to the imagination.
The slightest hand movements, for example, are needlessly detailed, slowing the pace of the story right down. My English lecturer used to suggest to us to think of words as pounds (or dollars, whatever), and that we should try to spend as little as possible as we write, because superfluous words are just that. Superfluous.
I don't know if I'm allowed to quote from the book, or if that is an infringement on some copyright laws or something, so I'll just say that the author is also always needlessly repeating the same information in chapters, as if feeling the need to always "catch us up." It gets very tiresome after the first few chapters.
And lastly, I know Star Trek is full of heroes, but people have their dark sides too. The entire DS9 cast comes across in this book as being so... perfect. Like they would never ever make a bad decision, do the wrong thing, think too badly about anyone, or hold a grudge. Again, it's really tiresome.
I found the same thing in the Avatar duology. The crews of DS9 and Enterprise got on so well. Every time two characters met for the first time it was like "They didn't know each other, but they instantly felt like they would get along." Main characters from different series are allowed to not get along. It's only natural, and conflict makes for better stories.
Just wanted to get those things out of my system, and see what the general consensus was

Peace.