Hi @Andrej Papeša ,
Greetings Avro Arrow and Hello to all. Thank you for the input.
...I wanted to see some responses first, before I put my two cents, however, of course,...
-My infatuation with Star Trek is first with the philosophy and social construct. How even so different people from different backgrounds, can live, love, work, learn and thrive while busy going forward. That is of course stemming from the vision of Gene Roddenberry and I do believe that the fact he is an agnostic has a lot to do with that. Plus travel, new places, new people, technology, Stars and new adventures. I feel bad for Captains though since they are esspecially greatly deprived of eternal romantic Love and family. Next Star Trek we should-could break the Prime directive in a good way and correct that. Don't you think?
I've said this here before, but the TOS two-parter "The Menagerie" went a long way towards making the Star Trek Universe feel real. It gave the world a sense of history that other science fiction shows didn't have at the time. It gave both Spock and the Enterprise a definite past stretching back a couple of decades. The Pike Era had its own slightly retro feel, just because of the different cast and different, more 1950s aesthetic from the first pilot from just two years before. Heck, we might not have even gotten the "Vulcans live longer than humans" concept if it wasn't for an adult Spock being in that flashback from 13 years before. So that cost-saving measure really paid a lot of dividends back to Star Trek in the long run.Continuity and world building. That was probably what hooked me. The world of Star Trek felt real. Places, people, events, food, recreation. It felt like I could wake up on the Enterprise (no bloody A, B, C or D) and know exactly what to do and where to go.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.