Wells class

Discussion in 'Trek Tech' started by Bill Morris, Aug 26, 2009.

  1. Bill Morris

    Bill Morris Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Funny about the size. Ex Astris Scientia and other Web sites show it at 336 meters overall length, yet I've looked at Rick Sternbach's drawings, and they all show it scaled to 195. Some of the labeling is from one of his drawings.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. sojourner

    sojourner Admiral In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Just around the bend.
    I dislike the use of "temporal" so much on the msd. It feels like one of those old science fiction tropes of just adding whatever FTOM science words to things to make them sound "sci-fi".
     
  3. Kross

    Kross Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Why does it need escape pods? Could it just jump back in time before it was attacked?
     
  4. Bill Morris

    Bill Morris Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    CREWMAN: Everything's offline, 47 seconds to a core breach!

    CAPTAIN: Get down to the Aeon and see if you can send us back to yesterday!

    CREWMAN: Damned tubolift door won't open!

    CAPTAIN: I TOLD them we needed escape pods on this bucket!
     
  5. Kross

    Kross Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Yes, but then the explosion is detected by SF, who deploys the Enterprise-Q (commanded by Captain James Luc Sisko) on a mission to go back in time and rescue the ship. :)
     
  6. Bill Morris

    Bill Morris Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    I know, but would you serve on a ship with no escape pods, unless there was a backup copy of yourself in a transporter buffer in a supposedly safe location at Starfleet HQ? Escape pods are cheap in the 29th century.
     
  7. Kross

    Kross Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Whats the point of escaping in a pod if you're ship is being attacked and destroyed by an enemy ship? I mean, why wouldn't they just destroy the pods too?

    MY LOGIMICALNESS IS FLAWLESS.
     
  8. Bill Morris

    Bill Morris Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Escape pods often escape battle scenes. Sisko and his son survived Wolf 359 that way. Worf survived a battle scene in one.

    And a Wells class is less likely to be damaged in any firefight than by some equipment failure, in which case the pods would be useful, since it's as powerful as ships can be expected to get, not that the writers couldn't dream up a worthy foe, like participants in the Temporal Cold War often mentioned in ENT. But they wouldn't engage it in a space battle. They would go back in time and try to prevent it from ever having existed. But that's why it has temporal shields. Tough little ship.
     
  9. DiSiLLUSiON

    DiSiLLUSiON Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Escape pods are less useful if you're not in your original timeframe; make one Wells class ship blow up and the survivors are guaranteed to make massive changes to the timeline by their mere existence. Nah, better to let them go down with the ship.
     
  10. Bill Morris

    Bill Morris Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Well, my theory is that an enforcement vessel like this doesn't leave its own timeframe. They sometimes send out the Aeon, and they can use their temporal transporter to send people back and forth, if necessary, and never see or send anyone to their own future. And the ship is protected from timeline changes by its temporal shields.

    In that scenario, when they tell someone they can scan time, that's like a magician telling about a trick but not how it's done. All that's required is to have two historical databases, one protected by temporal shielding and the other not. Then all they are really doing is having the computer look for differences and, when something is found, run an analysis looking for the cause. Later, after some "clean-up" operation, they can have the computer check the two databases again and score the results.

    And no, I have no plan to change the label to "temporal escape pods."
     
  11. sojourner

    sojourner Admiral In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Just around the bend.
    :lol:

    hehe, better to have lifepods and not need them than to need lifepods and not have them.
     
  12. Saquist

    Saquist Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Location:
    Starbase Houston
    I feel similarly.
     
  13. Kross

    Kross Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Remove those escape pods and you'd have enough room for a Hooters. ;)
     
  14. DiSiLLUSiON

    DiSiLLUSiON Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    If the ship is never intended to leave its own timeframe, then the massive temporal impeller and stabilizer fields seem quite redundant. It takes up a huge amount of space for something that's only used in emergencies.
     
  15. Bill Morris

    Bill Morris Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    I think I can safely call this schematic done.

    What might seem redundant may be necessary equipment for the job of temporal enforcement, since violators may be from their own time or their own future, and they have to be prepared. Besides, a temporal impeller cuts travel time as they go so they don't spend years cutting across half the galaxy then go back to their own time, which would give them ability to violate their own law by seeing their own future before jumping back. So it helps them do the job without danger of accidently or othewise turning them into violators themselves.
     
  16. sojourner

    sojourner Admiral In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Just around the bend.
    I still think you have overused the word "temporal". Does it really need to prefix the disrupters, transporters, and warpcore?
     
  17. Bill Morris

    Bill Morris Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Rick Sternbach's labeled sketch shows temporal/subspace disruptor. temporal emitter/nav deflector, temporal impeller, and temporal warp core. Captain Braxton mentioned the Temporal Integrity Commission, and we saw how they used that transporter on the bridge. I left out termporal computer core and temporal shield generators and emitters and avoided the T-word with the deflector/rift emitter and distortion matrix.

    What can be changed, and to what, without omitting a label for some vital system?

    I started work on another Klingon ship--no whales this time.
     
  18. judge alba

    judge alba senior street judge Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Location:
    mega city 1
    I dont mean to sound like a chump but i cant say i've heard of the welles class. is it a made up shi or was it in a ep? also it sounds like it was a time ship sort of thing.

    but it's still good anyways
     
  19. sojourner

    sojourner Admiral In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Just around the bend.
    It was in a Voyager episode, forget the title. Basically starfleet time police from the future need 7 of 9 to help them clean up a temporal intrusion.
     
  20. judge alba

    judge alba senior street judge Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Location:
    mega city 1
    It was? I hang my head in shame until i watch more Voyager