Was a TOS movie ever discussed (or considered) in the 60s?

Discussion in 'Star Trek - The Original & Animated Series' started by Commander Kielbasa, Jun 8, 2017.

  1. Commander Kielbasa

    Commander Kielbasa Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2016
    I know there were many attempts at a revival of TOS in some form during the mid 1970s, but I am curious if there was any talk (whether serious or just tossed about) of doing a TOS movie anytime between 1964 and 1969?
     
  2. mb22

    mb22 Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    From Memory Alpha:

    The notion of a Star Trek movie was originally considered amid the making of TOS Season 2, while DeForest Kelley, Gene Roddenberry and Gregg Peters were having lunch together. "The three of us came up with the idea of doing a motion picture version of the show during the hiatus," remembered Kelley, "That far back, we thought, what a terrific thing that would be. Had we done it, God knows what might have been the result of it. It was much later that 2001 and Star Wars came along. We were all ahead of our time in the thinking, even then [....] We kicked the idea about off and on and then it was kicked out the window; 'Who would ever think of making a motion picture out of a television show?'" Despite that being the verdict which the creative staff reached at the time, the idea of making a Star Trek motion picture persisted for years to come. (Cinefantastique, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 43)
     
  3. Spock's Barber

    Spock's Barber Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2014
    Location:
    Standing Next To Kirk
    I'm not the expert on this, but I think they were having enough difficulty producing the television show on time and on budget without the headaches of making a major motion picture. Interesting idea, though.
     
    somebuddyX likes this.
  4. ZapBrannigan

    ZapBrannigan Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Location:
    New York State
    The Man From UNCLE released several big screen movies abroad. They were cut together from existing episodes, with bits of new footage added here and there to spice them up.

    Obviously Batman shot an actual movie that we all know about, which is pretty remarkable. It proves that Star Trek could have done the same thing if the studio had been willing.
     
    JonnyQuest037 and Classic_Colin like this.
  5. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    In point of fact: Gene wanted to turn The Cage into a feature by shooting some additional scenes (there are memos to this effect), but had no luck getting Jeffrey Hunter back even for that.
     
  6. captainkirk

    captainkirk Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Location:
    South Africa
    Didn't Roddenberry announce at a sci-fi convention in 1969 that he planned to do a prequel movie showing how the crew met?
     
    F. King Daniel likes this.
  7. TREK_GOD_1

    TREK_GOD_1 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Location:
    Escaped from Delta Vega
    Of course, that depends on budget. For example, The Munsters movie--Munsters Go Home--had the advantage of the sets and locations (largely Universal backlot and an off site racetrack location) already available on the TV series. Moving to color was the biggest expense, but it was a budget friendly production.

    Star Trek is a different animal, as there would have been a demand to "go big" with every end of the FX and locations, which could have been a budget buster considering that most ST stories involve alien worlds, etc.
     
    somebuddyX likes this.
  8. Noname Given

    Noname Given Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Noname Given
    the only concrete plan I know of was the fact they shot extra footage when they did the original pilot - "The Cage" - so that if the show didn't sell, they could cut more stuff in and release it as a feature film to theaters (and given the level of science fiction films of the era pre "2001: A Space Odyssey" as this would have been released in 1965 - they probably would have at least made production costs back.)
     
  9. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    What extra footage? You mean the 63 minute running time?
     
  10. Harvey

    Harvey Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    James Blish apparently told James Ashe that a Trek movie might be in the works in early to mid-1967; Ashe wrote Roddenberry on May 4, 1967 asking him to confirm or deny the rumor.

    And @Maurice is right -- "The Menagerie" (the final name of the first pilot; "The Cage" was a working title that was changed) did not have enough footage for a theatrical release. That's why Roddenberry inquired with Hunter about shooting some extra scenes after it was finished.
     
  11. Spock's Barber

    Spock's Barber Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2014
    Location:
    Standing Next To Kirk
    Just from seeing interviews and memos from various TOS production members, Lucy had a tight reign on the penny pinching budget department at Desilu. Then when Bluhdorn took over, the TOS budget seemed to get progressively smaller.
     
  12. Classic_Colin

    Classic_Colin Lieutenant Junior Grade Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    If only a film had been made and released depicting the final mission/end of the five year mission in '69, after the series ended. Batman had a major feature film, after all.

    It is odd to think that the '60s is the only decade since the Star Trek franchise began not to have had a Trek feature film.
     
    Spock's Barber likes this.
  13. Spock's Barber

    Spock's Barber Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2014
    Location:
    Standing Next To Kirk
    I think Paramount Pictures realized that they may have made a major mistake in cancelling TOS, even though the series ratings and revenues were low. Boy, has the studio recouped any loses they incurred in the 1960's with the present ST movie franchise. Million$ and million$.
     
  14. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    1. The Batman movie was originally intended to come out before the series, until ABC moved the show up to a mid-season replacement. The movie was shot after the 1st (half) season and largely used to introduce the property into foreign markets.
    2. Paramount didn't cancel the show. NBC cancelled the show.
     
    Harvey likes this.
  15. Spock's Barber

    Spock's Barber Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2014
    Location:
    Standing Next To Kirk
    Yes I know that, but both Solow and Justman stated that Paramount basically gave TOS the word during the 3rd season, "You're ratings are low, your revenue is low, your costs are high so our interest in your series is low." Technically, the studio was "cancelling" TOS before the network gave it the ax.
     
  16. Firebird

    Firebird Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Location:
    On the Cinerama screen, in glorious Technicolor.
    Was there any actual content of the proposed scenes in these memos, or was Roddenberry just trying to get the ball rolling at the prospect?
     
  17. Ryan Thomas Riddle

    Ryan Thomas Riddle Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    This was brought up in a previous Trekbbs thread on a possible 1968 Star Trek movie. Here's what I said about it in that thread:

    And here's the quote from The Art of Star Trek:
     
    Spock's Barber likes this.
  18. Methuselah Flint

    Methuselah Flint Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Location:
    UK
    I'm sure Doohan states on the UK 3 episode per tape, that the crash of the Columbia and a scene with Pike and injured crewman post-Rigel away mission, were some examples
     
    Spock's Barber likes this.
  19. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    "Technically" means "exactly", but what you argue is "effectively". Anyway, studios rarely kill shows of their own volition. Selling a new show is very difficult (most pilots fail, and most shows then didn't make more than one season) , so, as long as it's not losing money for the studio and the network picks it up, they keep making it. The studio usually just whacks the budget to compensate (as Paramount did). Sometimes the network reduces the licensing fee, which then makes the show lose money, and the studio will pull the plug, but that (lowered fees from the network) wasn't the case for Star Trek.
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2017
    Harvey likes this.
  20. Harvey

    Harvey Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    In fact, NBC paid more per episode for the third season than in previous years. Their license fee escalated each season, per contract.