Warp Speed calculations using Fibonacci numbers

Discussion in 'Trek Tech' started by Sgt_G, Sep 9, 2018.

  1. Sgt_G

    Sgt_G Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    I had a oddball idea and played around with some numbers to see if it would work. What if the Warp Speed calculation are misunderstood? What if instead of W being linear, it actually follows a spiral as described by the Fibonacci Sequence?

    Under the current method Warp Speed cubed equals Light Speed:

    1 = 1 = one LY takes a year
    2 = 8 = one LY takes 45 days
    3 = 27 = one LY takes 13 days
    4 = 64 = one LY takes 6 days
    5 = 125 = one LY takes 3 days
    6 = 216 = one LY takes 40 hours
    7 = 343 = one LY takes 25 hours
    8 = 512 = one LY takes 17 hours
    9 = 729 = one LY takes 12 hours
    10 = 1000 = one LY takes 9 hours


    However, if we go by the Fibonacci Sequence, the first two numbers, 0 & 1, are sub-light. The third number, also 1, would be Warp 1. Same as above. Warp 2 = 1+1, and Warp 3 = 1+2. So far so good. But the next Fibonacci number means Warp 4 becomes 2+3 = 5, and then Warp 5 becomes 3+5=8. The chart then becomes:

    1 (0+1) = 1^3= 1 = one LY takes a year
    2 (1+1) = 2^3 = 8 = one LY takes 45 days
    3 (1+2) = 3^3 = 27 = one LY takes 13 days
    4 (2+3) = 5^3 = 125 = one LY takes 3 days
    5 (3+5) = 8^3 = 512 = one LY takes 17 hours
    6 (5+8) = 13^3 = 2,197 = one LY takes 4 hours
    7 (8+13) = 21^3 = 9,261 = one LY takes 56 minutes
    8 (13+21) = 34^3 = 39,304 = one LY takes 13 minutes
    9 (21+34) = 55^3 = 166,375 = one LY takes 3 minutes
    10 (34+55) = 89^3 = 704,969 = one LY takes 45 seconds

    [All times are rounded off.]

    Under this chart, you can actually get someplace in a reasonable amount of time.

    Thought???
     
    JasonJ, Markonian and Pauln6 like this.
  2. Mytran

    Mytran Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    That's an intriguingly original (yet mathematic) way to get the ever increasing speeds required for higher warp factors.

    It'll be interesting to see how it compares to TOS's usual suspects ;)
     
    JasonJ and Ronald Held like this.
  3. CRM-114

    CRM-114 Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Location:
    North Hills, CA
    Out of curiosity, where was it established the warp scale was based on Light Speed cubed?
     
  4. Mytran

    Mytran Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    The season 2 writers' guide, then popularised in Whitfield's book
     
  5. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Voyager. 'Nuff said.
     
  6. Sgt_G

    Sgt_G Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    Meaning?
     
  7. thribs

    thribs Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2017
    There is a memory Alpha Page about warp speeds and goes into the differences between the TOS and next gen scales.
    There are even equations.
     
  8. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    In Star Trek the Enterprise went fast over long distances on a few occasions. Yet in Voyager it was to take 75 years to make it home.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2018
  9. Sgt_G

    Sgt_G Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    I'm aware. I was just suggesting another option....

    Ah. Okay. I was afraid you were referring to that stupid "Warp Ten" episode.
     
    Markonian likes this.
  10. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    You mean that bad dream Tom had after watching too many Captain Proton episodes.

    Though, to address your OP. It's interesting to see a Fibonacci warp scale. I've never heard of one before.
     
    Markonian likes this.
  11. Mytran

    Mytran Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    How would you go about calculation partial warp factors with a Fibonacci sequence?
     
  12. Sgt_G

    Sgt_G Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    It should probably be some sort of log scale, but for simple math, I would just on a linear scale based on the difference between the two whole number values. 3 --> 5 = 0.2 each, 5 -- > 8 = 0.3 each, etc, etc.
     
  13. Mark_Nguyen

    Mark_Nguyen Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta
    I like it as a sci-fi concept. The thing is, the Fibonacci sequence is an abstract mathematical concept... It doesn't REALLY mean anything or have consequences in the physical world; it's really just a "neat thing" some Italian nerd came up with and published. You can argue that cubing the warp factor is equally as abstract when applied to velocities, but at least as a concept it does get applied to other real-world maths.

    In TNG they tried applying it roughly to some mysterious universal constant of lightspeed travel as it relates to power required to travel a certain warp factor. The power/speed line that they came up with was completely arbitrary, but at least it was an attempt at relating actual physics to sci-fi concepts.

    Mark
     
    DSG2k likes this.
  14. Sgt_G

    Sgt_G Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    Actually, the Fibonacci sequence is found all over nature, such as in the arrangment of petals on a flower.

    Why would it work for Warp Drive? My explantion is each Warp level creates a "shell" of warped space/time, nesting the previous level(s). The size of each shell increases (or perhaps reduces) in a ratio following the sequence, which also happens to be close to the Golden Ratio = 1.618
     
    DSG2k and JasonJ like this.
  15. CorporalCaptain

    CorporalCaptain Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Location:
    Sickbay
  16. Sgt_G

    Sgt_G Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    I used to be really good at math, but that looks Greek to me. :whistle:
     
  17. Mytran

    Mytran Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    CorporalCaptain likes this.
  18. Jedi Marso

    Jedi Marso Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Location:
    Idaho
    Neat idea.
     
  19. JasonJ

    JasonJ Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    I'm on board with this as a possibility... it makes sense to me. On this scale, Earth to Vulcan 16LY away at warp 6 would take just a touch under 3 days, which fits with what Scotty tells Spock in one of the films (I forget which- it was when he offered Spock a ride back home).

    Of course, if Voyager could sustain it without too many long breaks/cool downs, they could have reached the AQ in 166 days at Warp 9. Even at slower warp speeds on this scale, and accounting for the odd nebula or alien first contact and warp core cool down... still a far cry from the 80 years they say on screen. But then again, the show wouldn't be able to go on for as long if that were the case.
     
    DSG2k likes this.
  20. Matthew Raymond

    Matthew Raymond Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2016
    Call me old-fashioned, but I feel like it's a mistake to use a Warp scale where you need a copy of MATLAB to calculate a decimal Warp factor.