Reminds me of an old review of Ebert's:So far early reviews seem decentish.
I thought it was good.
I wouldn't really call it a horror movie. It was more of a romantic comedy. It was obviously inspired by Romeo and Juliet, with two characters from two different groups meeting up and finding out the other side isn't that bad. The bonies were cool baddies.
It was pretty funny at times and there was a nice ending.
...
I saw a post on Facebook "boycotting" what they called the "pussification of horror movies" and trying to link this to Twilight. I don't see this in any way, shape, or form presenting a threat to horror movies. It's not a horror movie, it's really not billed as one, and judging by the preview for The Last Exorcism Part II," I don't think horror movies have anything to fear (pun, intended).
...
...
I saw a post on Facebook "boycotting" what they called the "pussification of horror movies" and trying to link this to Twilight. I don't see this in any way, shape, or form presenting a threat to horror movies. It's not a horror movie, it's really not billed as one, and judging by the preview for The Last Exorcism Part II," I don't think horror movies have anything to fear (pun, intended).
...
I'm sorry, but that's stupid. The Twilight movies aren't even meant to be "horror" movies. Just because something has monsters in it doesn't mean it's a horror movie, just like something having cops in it doesn't make it a "cop movie". There are enough of real horror movies coming out that I don't see how stuff like this is any kind of threat.
I saw it last week and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I'm not a fan of romantic films or horror, but this was neither and yet both at the same time, which is why I liked it so much. It's a zombie film with a heart, literally and figuratively. It's also got a witty first person narrative from the main character's perspective, and the actor makes R's character so lovable.
I give it a solid A.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.