• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Very Interesting IGN UK Review

Carpe Occasio

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
This quoted section of the review only has minor spoilers for those who have not seen any trailers or have not been lurking on Star Trek forums.


As an action movie, it doesn't work, or indeed make sense.

No matter how much I enjoyed the dialogue and character interaction, despite my affection for the characters, I was never on the edge of my seat. I never felt as though Kirk or Spock were in genuine peril, and at no point was there the sense that this was a large-scale space adventure being ruthlessly propelled towards a grandstanding conclusion by its own dramatic intensity.

This is because the plot is a complete mess. Most of you know that the storyline incorporates a time travelling element that sees Nero return from 30 years in the future to exact vengeance. It's a story that is somewhat complicated and requires considerable exposition to keep it barely comprehensible.

Abrams is a self-confessed Star Wars fan, and he should have learnt that when constructing your own epic space movie, the best course of action is to keep things simple. The evil Empire has built a Death Star. The rebels must destroy it. After watching Star Trek, I'm still not totally sure what Nero's evil plans were or how he was going about accomplishing them.

It doesn't help that the film's best action moments occur in the first 10 minutes of the film. The movie begins with an awesome space battle (that can be glimpsed in the trailer) that had me quivering in my seat, anticipating the mind-blowing sci-fi action I would soon experience. However, Star Trek never replicates these early moments of exhilaration during the remainder of its running time. As the plot gets bogged down in its labyrinthine narrative, the mind begins to wander and you pine to see Spock and Kirk argue again.

The film is never boring, but it never takes off in a way that is seriously exhilarating or electrifying. These days we expect our $200 million summer movies to compete with The Dark Knight and Transformers: Both are obviously very different films, but they are united in their narrative urgency and intensity. Star Trek never approaches those heights.


Full Review at http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/973/973956p1.html
 
This quoted section of the review only has minor spoilers for those who have not seen any trailers or have not been lurking on Star Trek forums.


As an action movie, it doesn't work, or indeed make sense.

No matter how much I enjoyed the dialogue and character interaction, despite my affection for the characters, I was never on the edge of my seat. I never felt as though Kirk or Spock were in genuine peril, and at no point was there the sense that this was a large-scale space adventure being ruthlessly propelled towards a grandstanding conclusion by its own dramatic intensity.

This is because the plot is a complete mess. Most of you know that the storyline incorporates a time travelling element that sees Nero return from 30 years in the future to exact vengeance. It's a story that is somewhat complicated and requires considerable exposition to keep it barely comprehensible.

Abrams is a self-confessed Star Wars fan, and he should have learnt that when constructing your own epic space movie, the best course of action is to keep things simple. The evil Empire has built a Death Star. The rebels must destroy it. After watching Star Trek, I'm still not totally sure what Nero's evil plans were or how he was going about accomplishing them.

It doesn't help that the film's best action moments occur in the first 10 minutes of the film. The movie begins with an awesome space battle (that can be glimpsed in the trailer) that had me quivering in my seat, anticipating the mind-blowing sci-fi action I would soon experience. However, Star Trek never replicates these early moments of exhilaration during the remainder of its running time. As the plot gets bogged down in its labyrinthine narrative, the mind begins to wander and you pine to see Spock and Kirk argue again.

The film is never boring, but it never takes off in a way that is seriously exhilarating or electrifying. These days we expect our $200 million summer movies to compete with The Dark Knight and Transformers: Both are obviously very different films, but they are united in their narrative urgency and intensity. Star Trek never approaches those heights.


Full Review at [URL="http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/973/973956p1.html"]http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/973/973956p1.html[/URL]

I couldn't DISagree more with this review. For my money, it's a better movie the TDK, and so much better than the mess that was Transformers. It was exhilarating, with an engaging story and wonderful characters. The plot was clear if you were paying attention. Had the reviewer their girlfriend /boyfriend with them? I think the other reviews are proving this one wrong. It's a great movie.
 
My thinking is the reviewer wasn't expecting a movie where there would be an almost non-linear plot, or something that had to have some attention given to it to follow.

Almost like the original Mission: Impossible - if you tuned in half way, you had no idea what was going on, and it looked to be a scattered plot.
 
I've always thought that a movie critic should have to see a movie at least twice before writing a review. I think most critics get so wrapped up in taking notes and jotting down their thoughts that they miss half the movie they're watching. They should watch it once without any note taking or other movie critic type distractions. Then they can watch it again to take notes, write down comments, etc.
 
I couldn't DISagree more with this review. For my money, it's a better movie the TDK, and so much better than the mess that was Transformers. It was exhilarating, with an engaging story and wonderful characters. The plot was clear if you were paying attention. Had the reviewer their girlfriend /boyfriend with them? I think the other reviews are proving this one wrong. It's a great movie.
Yeah -- that's what I don't get about this review. No one else who saw the film has reported that the plot is complicated and "barely comprehensible". I read quite a few professional reviews and several "regular" fan reviews, and they all seemed to understand the plot quite adequately.

Perhaps the reviewer needs to pay a little more attention to the film.
 
Since when is Independance Day a great summer movie? It's fun but mentioning it in the same line as Star Wars and Jaws is blasphemy. Also, he says that Karl Urban as Bones is disappointing.:wtf:
Urban is fantastic!! One of the best things in the movie (and that's saying something).
Does this guy get paid for reviews like this? What was he watching?
 
Independence Day was a great summer blockbuster movie.

I think the reviewer was not paying attention to the movie, as his/her review is so different from all the other reviews. I could understand if he/she did not enjoy the movie, but it sounds as if he/she was not really paying attention to the movie.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top