• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Unresolved Trek trailer questions

I think this movie will be better than the last 10 years of "Star Trek"

As would a hernia.

TGT

Or massive hemmorhoids.

Or a fork in the eye.

In other words, it needs to be as good as DS9's last four seasons, TNG's 3rd and 4th season and/ or TOS's 2nd season (I won't expect anything to be as good as TOS's 1st season) before I'll believe that Trek is Back (TM), no matter how hyped hopeful fans are from a pretty, shiny trailer.

Call me a cynic, but we've got to have standards.


My point, exactly!
 
it is entirely impossible for it to have evolved naturally because they decided they wanted a culture ruled by logic rather than emotion.

What Voyager episode said there was an organ for this anyway? I can't find any reference to that.
 
Don't get me wrong, 'Holmes, I was one of, if not the first to suggest arcologies around here. But there are so many of them seen on the horizon shots. Usually arcologies are proposed in SF literature as single, monolithic replacements for cities. One, maybe two goes up in every big city. But these things seem to be everywhere.

To me, these things seem so huge that they're not neccessarilly everywhere, just that they can be seen from practically anywhere. Judging by the atmospheric haze, they are so incredibly far away that they would dwarf even Everest significantly. Half a dozen of these built in North America, would be visable from everywhere in North America.

This is what puzzles me about these structures though, what type of structure would need to be so big it transcends atmospheric strata? Neither arcologies or weather stations, or even starship factories can really account for the scales involved. Unless they're a lot closer and smaller than they appear, and are partially cloaked.

Whatever they are, they've got my imagination working.
 
^They may well be orbital towers/elevators. Load your completed Constitution-class starship into one, and lift it right into orbit.
 
Perhaps they are large arcologies, acknowledged to be such eyesores that they are deliberately shrouded in mist?

As for the "Meld" references to Vulcan biological adaptation to emotion suppression:

EMH: "There's a definite neuro-chemical imbalance in the mezio-frontal cortex."
Janeway: "Which means what?"
EMH: "That's where the Vulcan psycho-suppression systems are located."

No real mention of a specialized organ, just mention that a certain area of the cortex happens to be involved in the effort of "psycho-suppression". It's not even established that other species such as humans wouldn't have the very same thing (and indeed by current medical knowledge humans do).

On the broader issue, evolution of specialized organs as the result of cultural choices is by no means impossible or even unlikely. After all, our style of bipedal gait is probably the result of evolution initiated by the cultural choice of descending from the trees. And of the level discussed in "Meld", there are examples of certain areas of the motor cortex increasing in size and activity when one takes on e.g. violin playing. If the ability to play the violin were a survivability issue, then those with larger respective areas would enjoy an advantage and outbreed those with smaller areas, repeating the pseudo-Lamarckian feat but carrying it from generation to generation.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top