• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

UK Criminal Justice Can Be Useless.

TedShatner10

Commodore
Commodore
Link

Queue-jumping killer Tony Virasami jailed for four years

A couple who killed an innocent man after a row about queue-jumping at a supermarket were jailed yesterday.

Tony Virasami, 38, was sentenced to four years and Antonette Richardson, 37, who egged him on, was jailed for 18 months over the death of Kevin Tripp, 57, who was attacked after the pair confused him with somebody else.

Richardson was convicted of manslaughter in February. A jury was told that she called Virasami to the Sainsbury’s store after a confrontation with Adam Prendergast, another shopper, on June 10 last year. The court was told that Mr Prendergast accused her of pushing in whilst she was queuing at the cigarette kiosk in the store in Merton, southwest London. In the “fierce” row that followed, he threatened to knock her out.

In response, she rang Virasami, who was waiting for her in a car outside. When he arrived she pointed towards Mr Prendergast, but he thought that she was pointing at Mr Tripp. Virasami immediately marched over to him, accused him of fighting with his wife and, without giving him a chance to reply, hit him.

The force of the blow threw Mr Tripp off his feet and he hit the floor so hard that his skull fractured, causing bleeding on the brain. He died in hospital.

Virasami was arrested in the supermarket on June 10 and Richardson was detained the next day at the couple’s home in Catford, southeast London.

Sentencing Virasami at Southwark Crown Court, Judge Geoffrey Rivlin QC said that the jail term reflected the “revulsion and concern felt by Mr Tripp’s nearest and dearest”.

Despite the victim lying on the ground after the blow — which was captured on the store’s CCTV camaras — an apparently dissatisfied Richardson was overheard saying: “We need to find the right guy.”

The judge said that Mr Tripp, who suffered from ME, was an “entirely innocent man”. He said: “He was just minding his own business, waiting in a queue to be served at the customer services counter, when suddenly you, Mr Virasami, rushed towards him and took such a powerful swing at his head that he was immediately floored.”

The judge said that Virasami had numerous convictions, mostly for offences of dishonesty but also for assault and robbery, which had resulted in a substantial term of imprisonment. “It would have been bad enough if the right man had been struck, but that an entirely innocent man has lost his life, and his family have lost him forever, is a grave matter indeed,” he said. “You set out to commit an offence of violence in a public place, a store where it might be expected that shoppers would be going about their proper business.”

Virasami had pleaded guilty to manslaughter.

Mr Tripp’s partner, Josie James, said after the hearing: “It’s not long enough. They took Kevin’s life. The judge was pretty fair, but his hands were tied.”

While I'm not a firm believer in the death penalty and feel like America's prisons are mainly gulags for the poor and inadequeate rather than the very dangerous, in Britain I feel there has been a serious miscarriage of justice if a dangerous career criminal has not been properly dealt with after killing some random stranger because he was getting furious at crowd movement. Maybe the death was unintentional, but something must be very wrong if we give light sentences to sociopaths who have no fear about going around attacking innocent bystanders in public spaces.
 
I bet if he keeps his head down he will not have to sever the full 4 years.:(
The prisons are full and no one wants to pay for anymore or have one of there door step.
 
That's a bit light for me... I'd give 5 years to the woman and 10-20 to the man, if I had my way.
 
What's the maximum sentence for manslaughter in the UK? Considering the fact that he seemed to be rather unapologetic, he should have received that.
 
The death penalty does not really work since America still has a fairly high murder rate. However I really think Great Britain should re-adopt the law enforcement policies that Singapore adopted from 1950s Britain.
 
I'm not familiar with how the prosecutors are selected (appointed, elected etc) in the UK. Here in SE Virginia USA the city's/county's head prosecutor, referred to as the "Commonwealth's Attorney" is publicly elected periodically. Unless there is sound legal reason an offense as related above didn't result a more serious charge (with longer sentencing guidelines) such leniency would certainly become an issue in the next Commonwealth Attorney election.
 
What's the maximum sentence for manslaughter in the UK? Considering the fact that he seemed to be rather unapologetic, he should have received that.

Depending on circumstances, life is the maximum - I'd agree he should have got a lot more than he did.

I'm not familiar with how the prosecutors are selected (appointed, elected etc) in the UK. Here in SE Virginia USA the city's/county's head prosecutor, referred to as the "Commonwealth's Attorney" is publicly elected periodically. Unless there is sound legal reason an offense as related above didn't result a more serious charge (with longer sentencing guidelines) such leniency would certainly become an issue in the next Commonwealth Attorney election.

The Crown Prosecution Service here is completely separate from the political process. I don't believe the harshness of charge or sentence should be determined by what will win most votes at the next election. That isn't to say I find this sentence appropriate, but I don't want how long people are locked away for to become a political game.
Btw, how does the Commonwealth Attorney influence what the Judge sentences the offender too? Or do you mean this guy should have been charged with a more serious offence? Because I can't think of one that fits, myself. He certainly isn't guilty of murder.
 
What's the maximum sentence for manslaughter in the UK? Considering the fact that he seemed to be rather unapologetic, he should have received that.

Depending on circumstances, life is the maximum - I'd agree he should have got a lot more than he did.

Huh, I just figured out it's the same here. However, in a case like this, the maximum sentence in Germany would be 10 to 15 years. 10 years sounds about right.
 
If I were "The-Legal/Moral-Powers-That-Be" they'd both be sentenced to lengthy terms at Hard Labour, being forced to dig-ditches-at-riflepoint, or serve other useful purposes in society.

  • Serve dinners, mop/sweep floors and clean dishes at neighborhood soup kitchens.
  • Clean toilets at mens' / womens' shelters.
  • Be subject to random "recreational drug"-testing.
  • Be subject to a curfew.
  • Lifetime ban from caring for children or having any of their own.
  • Lifetime Ban from owning pets and ALL level of firearms from handguns to assault rifles, hunting rifles and paraphenalia.
  • DNA Forcibly Compelled / Submitted to ALL State / County / Federal Government Databases as "Reasonable Violent Threats To Society".
  • Pictures & Names Given As Safety Notice to Gay, Lesbian, Transgendered and Searching/Questioning Organizations, (as these kinds of people have hair-trigger tempers and due to recent attacks here in Davie Village in Vancouver, such communities should be given a fair heads-up when jerks like this are given their freedom. See "Michael Kandola", Fountainhead Pub.)

    (Somewhat related) gay-bashing stories:
  • http://archives.xtra.ca/Story.aspx?s=2259255
  • http://www.xtra.ca/public/National/...tainhead_gaybashing_as_a_hate_crime-6519.aspx

Both offenders should satisfy the deceased's family that they've dealt with their issues AND accept personal responsibility for their actions, via Mental Health before being considered for "early/faint-hope-clause" or "full-sentence-served" release.
 
Last edited:
Oh look, London police have also inadvertently killed a man (although it was less random and during a big demonstration).

Is the investigation over then? That was quick.


Good to know officers are indicted, tried and convicted in the public eye in this country before the investigation has even got off the ground. I wonder how people would react if this standard was used for members of the public accused of crimes?
"Tell you what, I've seen a 5 second video clip, so I'm going to dispense with an investigation and just send you straight to jail, you cool with that?"
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top