IIRC, the original plan was to have Worf appear as a TOS-style Klingon whenever they were in the past - and have nobody (not even Worf) notice the difference...
IIRC, the original plan was to have Worf appear as a TOS-style Klingon whenever they were in the past - and have nobody (not even Worf) notice the difference...
That would have been pretty funny. It would have driven the nitpickers nuts!
I doubt anyone would be confused, since it would be Dorn's voice, and the changes would be obvious if you watched the entire episode; Worf would still be at his post and with his friends. The only people confused would be those channel surfing.
The only people who wouldn't understand that that was supposed to be Worf would be those who didn't watch the whole episode, but pretty much anyone who hasn't seen TOS would still be massively confused and it would probably have dragged the episode down for many people.
How is it any different then seeing Klingons that still look nothing like the ones the viewers are used to seeing? Most people would see the visual gags going on with all the 1960s stuff anyways and understand. The benefits outweigh the tiny percentage that *may* have been confused.
It's a shame Worf wasn't made to look like a 1960's Klingon and sent to spy on the Klingon ship.
Why would they do that?
IIRC, the original plan was to have Worf appear as a TOS-style Klingon whenever they were in the past - and have nobody (not even Worf) notice the difference...
Did the writers have any farther reaching ideas about this at the time? Kang, Koloth and Kor appearing in S2 with ridges doesn't get as much scrutiny, maybe since there were no TOS Klingons to compare them to.
And then, did they feel compelled to revisit and expand on the matter on Enterprise?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.