• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TOS and the New Myth of the Machine

TiberiusK

Captain
Captain
A really interesting find. Do you agree or disagree with the author's interpretations and arguments? It's kind of a long read, but well worth it.

Full article: http://startrekdom.blogspot.com/2007/07/star-trek-and-new-myth-of-machine.html

Teaser for debate: Just as Star Trek is a meditation on the misuse of power without wisdom, so it is also a meditation on the dangers of false paradise. Repeatedly, Kirk and crew are enticed by the promise of a trouble-free life, and repeatedly, they have to resist temptation or go astray. Thus, Pike resists the efforts by the Talosians to control his will by offering him a paradise of endless illusions in which his desires will always be fulfilled. In another episode that is a not very disguised commentary on drugs, Kirk must save the crew, which has been made passive and euphoric, and has become part of a stagnant utopia on a colonized planet, by the effect of a local plant. In another episode, Kirk and crew must resist efforts to get them to settle into a life in a gilded prison in which they would be waited on by humanlike robots.

So we have here a future history and ethical vision that recognizes two kinds of limitation -- that of the external world and that of the "internal" world of human psychodynamics, narcissism, and character flaws. The series’ message about the proper attitude toward these two forms of limitation was repeated so many times it took on the qualities of a credo: those who answer the siren call of premature power and false paradise are lured into a side track, a dead end that promises a cure for the suffering of life but only accentuates the weaknesses of the human spirit. A heroic humanity refuses to be taken in by such promises, it tells us, realizing that the fight to resist these temptations is part of the struggle against his own limitations, a struggle one must engage in in order to grow and evolve into a higher form.

In every episode, it is the hero of the story, Captain Kirk, who provides the exemplar for how the human race must act if it hopes to mature from the young adulthood of the Federation into a race such as the Organians. When faced with challenges and his own fears and temptations, Kirk doesn't retreat, regress into illusion and dependence, seek false power or become a predator.* He proceeds into the heart of danger, stands his ground and seeks peaceful solutions in which various warring parties will come out ahead.
 
Yes, that seems pretty much on the mark. TOS is all about the danger of falling for easy solutions, whether it's Pike's fantasy paradise or the "bloodless" war of A Taste of Armageddon. Even The Doomsday Machine was an object lesson: some society created it so that they would be relieved from having to actively engage in warfare (how lazy can you get? :lol:) They made it automatic, and as a result destroyed themselves and created one of the worst monsters imaginable.

Of all things, it's the tribbles that are the best metaphor for this threat - they're furry and pleasant and innocuous, they drug you into an unguarded stupor, and the result is havok. The lesson is that life gives you no easy solutions and when you think it's done that, look closer: it's a lie.

I'm still astounded that so many people have the notion that TOS presented some sort of perfect commie hippie paradise, when in fact, it presented the opposite: a reality in which the only constant was eternal struggle.
 
^^^ I agree. TOS is more anti-utopia than utopian, and I never understand it when people talk about GR's utopian vision of the future.
 
^^^
The Utopian thing seems to come from GRs weird idea, contradicting just what the essay here points out, that humans are an evolved culture. Seems to me GR input this into TNG. Which was a "reboot" of Star Trek in large ways, not to mention being set 80 years ahead of the old gangs time.

But scenes where Picard would point out the "philosophy" of the Prime Directive or that humans no longer covet "things" and so on disappeared quickly.

Last nights TOS ep "This Side of Paradise" has one of my fav lines ever in Trek, these words contradict Picards TNG era in just the way I mean...

Kirk" Perhaps we weren't meant for paradise. Perhaps we were meant to struggle our way. Crawl, scratch for every inch."
 
Of course, it's very hard to argue that society is anything but vastly better off today than it was three hundred years ago, and we can reasonably expect things to be considerably better three hundred years from now. Such little things as personal liberty, security, respect for individuals, wealth, and power -- for all -- are so much better for the average person of 2007 than they were for 1707 that to the older perspective today could be reasonably seen as utopian. That we want better yet is a good thing; it's very likely to mean that the actual 23rd century is, by our standards, utopian, and yet they'll still want better.
 
Plum said:
^^^
The Utopian thing seems to come from GRs weird idea, contradicting just what the essay here points out, that humans are an evolved culture. Seems to me GR input this into TNG. Which was a "reboot" of Star Trek in large ways, not to mention being set 80 years ahead of the old gangs time.

But scenes where Picard would point out the "philosophy" of the Prime Directive or that humans no longer covet "things" and so on disappeared quickly.

Last nights TOS ep "This Side of Paradise" has one of my fav lines ever in Trek, these words contradict Picards TNG era in just the way I mean...

Kirk" Perhaps we weren't meant for paradise. Perhaps we were meant to struggle our way. Crawl, scratch for every inch."

Perhaps it could be argued that the TNG episode Justice was also anti-utopia. The society has achieved bliss with draconian laws, which is a kind of totalitarian utopia that TOS critiqued in so many instances (Return of the Archons, for example).

Or maybe "The Game" isn't that different a plot from TSOP?

The utopian fanatasies are stronger in TNG, but the themes of struggle v. brainwashed bliss, or freedom v. totalitarian forced happiness are still there.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top