And now you have an incredibly more elaborate story and set of conditions to pass off than they already had. Faking a distress call in the ship's records, faking medical tricorder readings to indicate a reason to believe they'd be safe for a day unconscious. faking computer records to indicate that the vitals of every crew member had been monitored for a whole day, a very suspicious story about Data taking over 1000 people to their beds by himself, not to mention the scattered reports of minor injuries, which either Data would have to claim he treated, or fake that they never happened, and no one aboard got even the slightest sprain when they all fell unconscious
That's a monumental stretch of imagination if you want people to just move on without invoking the curiosity to investigate. The best lies are the simplest lies. The more elaborate a lie is, the more likely the house of cards will collapse
Thankfully Data isn't doing the Riker Maneuver with the "correct" left leg and shoving his android crotch right in his ensign's ear.I do love Data doing "The Riker" on the OPS console. I have to believe Spiner was just mocking Frakes on set and the director loved it enough to actually shoot him doing that. Even then, it does add to how Data adopts certain mannerisms from Picard and Riker when he has to take command as seen in later episodes.
![]()
I don't think we've ever seen Data do the "Picard Maneuver", though.
The fact that the crew thinks it's "Monday" when the rest of Starfleet thinks it's "Tuesday" (or "Thursday" if you take into account all the extra time the second attempt took up) is a core flaw in this episode that really isn't addressed by the single line Data throws out about "adjusting chronometers". Even if every other clue were eliminated, this would be enough of an issue to unravel the case every time.
Also, Crusher's "transporter trace" clue didn't really make sense. She says it was based on our 24 hour bio cycle, but if they lost somewhere near 24 hours, then the cycle would be "reset", and she shouldn't have noticed a big difference when making her comparison. (Her explanation would've made sense if they'd lost 12 hours instead.)
Picard giving up essentially immediately was also weird. What proof was there that the aliens had the ability to destroy the Enterprise? What attempt at other solutions did Picard make?
It was an interesting premise and entertaining episode for many reasons. Putting Data in a situation where he had to lie to the crew is a great idea and a good old sci-fi trope (I was immediately reminded of HAL-9000). I only wish they'd spent a little more time working out the logic holes.
THIS HAS ALL HAPPENED BEFORE AND IT WILL HAPPEN AGAINWasn't this discussed back in, umm, 2014 or so...?
Not an unreasonable theory, although it would be pretty fundamental to the workings of the Trek universe if correct, and I've never seen any attempt to convey that this is the way things work to the audience. If time were dealt with in a realistic sense in the series, we should see people age at wildly different rates depending what they're doing relative to each other. (e.g. Enterprise comes back from a long mission and their families are all long dead...)It doesn't appear likely that there'd be much of a universal Tuesday in Starfleet. Starships zip back and forth through spatiotemporal anomalies, Einsteinian accelerations and other weirdness. They then connect to this common timebase when they get the chance - and sometimes this may happen just once a year or so, as we hear in "Contagion" and the like that Starfleet is perfectly happy with not hearing as much as a whisper about its big ships for half a year. Synching isn't in great demand, then, and only happens when convenient.
The explanation was necessarily fuzzy, but the key words were "24 hour cycle", implying that whatever she was measuring resets every 24 hours.Isn't Crusher actually saying that she can measure the stage in the sleep/awake cycle of the patient? She would then be able to tell that the heroes have slept for a very long time.
Picard thus is essentially leaving the planet to be on the safe side, but fully reserving the option of coming back later, possibly with a superior armada if need be.
Not an unreasonable theory, although it would be pretty fundamental to the workings of the Trek universe if correct, and I've never seen any attempt to convey that this is the way things work to the audience.
If time were dealt with in a realistic sense in the series, we should see people age at wildly different rates depending what they're doing relative to each other. (e.g. Enterprise comes back from a long mission and their families are all long dead...)
The explanation was necessarily fuzzy, but the key words were "24 hour cycle", implying that whatever she was measuring resets every 24 hours.
I hadn't considered that, but it would help explain Data's unusual expression as the last shot of the episode!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.