Tired of Blue Screen switching to Ubuntu

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Galactus, Dec 21, 2009.

  1. Galactus

    Galactus Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Location:
    The High Father
    For those keeping score, I replaced the hard drive in my computer and reinstalled Windows 7 RC to continue the evaluation. So now ever so often I get the dreaded Blue Screen. The stop message is different all the time. I have uninstalled and reinstalled all the programs one by one and it still happens. There is no extra hardware so I did not change that. The only thing I have not done is swipe out the memory because I don't have any laying around, but I did do the Windows Diagnostic test and it did not detect any problems. On top of that my screen keeps blinking for no reason. So as of now I am lost.


    With that said I decided I am just going switch to Ubuntu. I really don't want to give Micro$oft any of my money which is why I didn't buy the upgrade. So I have been looking around Ubuntu and it seems to do everything that I need at this point for this machine which is basically surf the web and run an office suite. The only other thing I will need to do is watch and burn CD/DVD's.



    So my question would be, are there people here who just run Ubuntu/Linux and nothing else? For those of you that dual-boot do you use Linux more than Windows. Will I have to spend a lot of time tweaking Ubuntu or has it finally gotten to the point where I can just use it with some minor tweaking like I am having to do with Windows 7?
     
  2. Robert Maxwell

    Robert Maxwell memelord Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2001
    Location:
    space
    I run Windows and Ubuntu. My web server runs CentOS.

    Ubuntu may or may not require tweaking to your needs. What do you usually do with your computer?
     
  3. sojourner

    sojourner Admiral In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Just around the bend.
    The latest Ubuntu is easier to install than Windows. If it weren't for my game addiction I would use nothing else.
     
  4. Galactus

    Galactus Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Location:
    The High Father
    I will just be using it for the basics. Web surfing, email, word processing, burning, and I guess the other common things. Maybe work on a couple of websites.

    I tired the new Live CD and had no problems.
     
  5. Robert Maxwell

    Robert Maxwell memelord Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2001
    Location:
    space
    You'll probably be fine, then.
     
  6. Iasius

    Iasius Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    I do use both Windows 7 and Ubuntu, so I can see why you might want to use either. However it's been ages since I've had a blue screen (many years). These days I'd be much more likely to suspect faulty hardware or drivers as a cause if I did get one and you certainly have problems there with Ubuntu as well.
     
  7. STR

    STR Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Location:
    Out there. Thatta way.
    Bingo. Don't blame Microsoft because ATI has s****y drivers.
     
  8. Amaris

    Amaris Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Location:
    United States
    Ubuntu is solid. I love Windows 7 though, not had a single blue screen yet.
    It's very fast, lightweight and stable compared to previous versions.

    J.
     
  9. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    I tried Ubuntu about a year and a half ago. It didn't impress me.

    OTOH, I've had Win7 Beta, RC and now full version. The only time I've had any real problem is right now. I'm having some issue with start-up after I allow it to switch back on some access setting. It's got something to do with programs making changes or something. I switched it off (low) so I wouldn't have to hit "yes" every time I want to run/install. Then I do a system restore to right before letting the action center switch it back on, and everything runs fine.

    Plus a couple minor compatibility issues, but liking it so far as the only OS on the machine.
     
  10. Jadzia

    Jadzia on holiday Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Location:
    England
    Linux traditionally has a reputation of being arcane and inaccessible to those who are unwilling to devote their lives to learning it. Ubuntu has tried to make it more user friendly, but if you ever want to dig beneath the surface, to alter things around, or do anything that isn't directly tied to the gui, then you might be wishing you were back with windows.

    I've tried linux a couple of times, including ubuntu, and I decided it wasn't for me. At the same time, I dislike the newer versions of windows. I don't want it. I don't like osx either. :(

    Go with whatever works best for you, and don't feel compelled to go with the newest thing just because it's new. Software doesn't wear out.
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2009
  11. Verteron

    Verteron Lux in tenebris lucet Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2001
    Location:
    London, UK
    I think you have hardware problems. Switching to Ubuntu isn't going to help that. I don't know of this 'Windows Diagnostic' test you speak of but memtest86 is the gold standard for checking memory. Other possibilities include heat damage to the GPU or memory on the graphics card, or heat damage to other parts of the computer.
     
  12. Admiral Buzzkill

    Admiral Buzzkill Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    I run Vista. I haven't had an operating machine failure in years. I use the thing for surfing the web, doing CG modeling, video editing and so forth.
     
  13. Dusty Ayres

    Dusty Ayres Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Location:
    ANS Yamato, Sector 5, Sol System
    Same here, which is why I converted to Windows XP Home Edition around the same time.
     
  14. Galactus

    Galactus Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Location:
    The High Father
    I am going to switch out the memory and see it that stops it. When I use Ubuntu I have had no problems. When I run Windows I do. It could be the memory, I haven't switch it out yet. I was talking about Windows Memory Diagnostic but I will try memtest86 to see what that turns up.
     
  15. USS KG5

    USS KG5 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    England's green and pleasant land.
    Ubuntu is great provided it does everything you want it to on first install, and has all the drivers you need.

    Anything more than this is like pulling teeth, and while a nice challenge for IT bods like me is a royal PITA for mr average joe.
     
  16. STR

    STR Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Location:
    Out there. Thatta way.
    I have to disagree with that on one point. While software doesn't wear out, it does become obsolete and even anachronistic. I would not use any OS that's no longer supported by its maker, because that leaves you open to malware, which not only impacts you but others as your PC becomes a spam zombie filling my trash bin with breast and "male" enlargers.
     
  17. Santaman

    Santaman Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Location:
    Tyre city
    I have to agree with you, sounds like a hardware problem.
     
  18. Shaw

    Shaw Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Location:
    Twin Cities
    Outside of Windows, what OS can you show as an example of this?

    I have four Silicon Graphics computers, all running IRIX (versions 5.3 and 6.2) with no issues. I have two Sun Microsystems computers running Solaris 7 and OPENSTEP 4.2 with no issues. I have my IBM ThinkPad which usually runs OPENSTEP 4.2, but also Rhapsody 5.1 from time to time, with no issues. I have a Power Macintosh 8600, PowerBook 3400c and PowerBook 2300c running Mac OS 8.6 with no issues. I have a Power Macintosh 8600 and PowerBook G3 Wallstreet running Mac OS X Server 1.2 with no issues. I have a Power Macintosh G3 MiniTower, PowerMac G4 and PowerBook G3 Lombard running Mac OS X v10.3.9 with no issues.

    Old unsupported operating systems are no more of a target for viruses and/or malware than they are for new software. Windows is the only target, new versions or old, it stands pretty much alone in that regard. And I don't ever recall any version of Windows being any less of a target just because Microsoft was still supporting it.

    The only problem I see with running older operating systems (other than Windows) is finding software that runs on them. That has never been an issue for me as I've been around long enough to have a lot of older software.
     
  19. USS KG5

    USS KG5 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    England's green and pleasant land.
    That is not really fair these days. Over the last year it has become more common for viruses/spyware to attack applications like Adobe Reader.

    Windows 7 is as secure as most other operating systems on a basic level it seems, and MS will conitnue patching it, and therefore Windows now is a secure option.

    The IPhone is apparently a popular target now, and has to be a good option for an attack.
     
  20. Shaw

    Shaw Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Location:
    Twin Cities
    It is completely fair... and will be until the reality of using Windows changes.

    On all platforms or just Windows?

    Most of the issues Adobe has with their Reader is that they have attempted to put too much into it (specially after acquiring Flash).

    So there have been no viruses and/or malware issues with Windows 7? Because it needs to be practically none for that statement to be valid.

    In all of the time that Mac OS X has existed, a Mac user's chance of getting viruses and/or malware was less than that of them getting struck by lightning. And I would venture that other non-Windows platforms have had the same experiences.

    Is Windows now that secure? :wtf:

    If you have to even think about viruses and/or malware on Windows 7, spend even a few seconds of your day worrying about it, how secure is it?

    And let us not forget what we are talking about... which was older (unsupported) operating systems. Other than Windows, these weren't targets when they were supported, and are even less of a target (and in most cases completely unknown) in recent years.

    Really?

    Besides the fact that the iPhone isn't a personal computer (so why bring it up?), how would you define popular? I've only heard of one experimental virus which only worked on iPhones hacked by their owners. It by popular you mean it got press coverage, then Windows is the least popular platform for attacks as most attacks won't even be noted by computer related news sites.

    In my home town we had a popular mountain to go to the summit of (Mt. Helix), which many people do on a nearly daily basis. That is popular. By comparison, few people actually reach the summit of Mt. Everest. That is note worthy.

    This is the nature of things... pretending that it is not so isn't going to alter the facts in any way.