Some random thoughts of mine.
1) At first blush, Odo comes across as domineering and little respect for authority-telling the commander where weapons can be fired and not.
2) After looking at the situation, there was no really controlling entity so there had to be some-type of authority-so Odo was the rules/authority.
3) Would he have told Dukat, that he doesn't allow disruptors/phasers on the Promenade?
4) Was there a protocol for Odo that would allow weapon's fire on the Promenade?
5) I'm guessing that Odo didn't like Sisko at first b/c of Sisko's presumptuousness about firing a weapon first and asking questions later
6) In Sisko's defense, he was simply trying to bring order to the situation. It MIGHT have stopped a bloodier situation b/c the big guy looked like he was gonna resist Odo. Sisko didn't shoot to kill, maim or injure-just to break up the fight. Sisko could have stunned or killed the big guy-wonder what Odo woulda said about that.
1) At first blush, Odo comes across as domineering and little respect for authority-telling the commander where weapons can be fired and not.
2) After looking at the situation, there was no really controlling entity so there had to be some-type of authority-so Odo was the rules/authority.
3) Would he have told Dukat, that he doesn't allow disruptors/phasers on the Promenade?
4) Was there a protocol for Odo that would allow weapon's fire on the Promenade?
5) I'm guessing that Odo didn't like Sisko at first b/c of Sisko's presumptuousness about firing a weapon first and asking questions later
6) In Sisko's defense, he was simply trying to bring order to the situation. It MIGHT have stopped a bloodier situation b/c the big guy looked like he was gonna resist Odo. Sisko didn't shoot to kill, maim or injure-just to break up the fight. Sisko could have stunned or killed the big guy-wonder what Odo woulda said about that.