I like both the design in the OP and the
Mawson design. (Ironically, the
Mawson seems to have a few qualities in common with the study model 'proto-
Voyager.') I do prefer the final ship Mr. Sternbach designed though. She's one of my favorite Trek starships. Like
JustKate said, no matter what you think of the show, it's purty.
The one thing that's always bugged me about the concept of
Voyager (not the design) was that it seemed like the producers wanted to have it both ways: they wanted a ship with limitations so being stranded would put them in real danger, yet the ship was completely state-of-the-art and seemed oh-so-conveniently ideally suited for long-term deep-space missions and heavy high-warp travel.
I would have preferred a reworked premise, to either say that:
- The Voyager is a brand new prototype testbed starship with a super-advanced suite of experimental systems that don't quite work right or work well together (think the Enterprise-A in ST:V) that has been lost on her maiden voyage, thus allowing for a technological edge yet limitations...
- Or the Voyager was 'just another ship' older and less advanced than the Enterprise-D or Defiant but still more advanced than anything in the Delta Quadrant and as suited to the task of returning home as any other Starfleet ship, but not uniquely so.
Either one could have still worked for the 'Caretaker' story. For the former - the mission to retrieve the Maquis is still because
Voyager is ideally suited for navigating the Badlants. For the latter, it's because
Voyager is the Only Ship in the Quadrant (tm.)