This idea was going to be part of my “Star Trek IV” thread, but in the middle of editing it I realized that it could start a thread of its own. Does anyone else think “Star Trek IV” could have made a good last outing for the original series crew? When the movie was over, I couldn’t help but think maybe we’d be better off if it was the last Star Trek movie featuring Kirk and company in the central roles.
I know a lot of you love Star Trek VI and I have a lot of admiration for it too. I admit that it was cool to see the origin of the Klingon alliance we see in the 24th century Star Trek shows. I enjoyed the villain’s over-the-top performance. Most importantly, I got a really nice feeling of closure and emotional satisfaction from Kirk’s monologue at the end seeming to symbolically “pass the torch” to the TNG crew. However, I still think we wouldn’t be much worse off if that movie had never been made. After my recent viewing of "Star Trek IV" ended, I started wondering what it would be like if the movie franchise had gone differently from there.
I started to wish we’d only had four movies with the original crew, none of which were terrible. I started to wish Star Trek V had been a re-tooled “Yesterday’s Enterprise” - maybe released circa 1990, still titled “Star Trek: Generations”, as the name would still make sense with that story. It could have then been followed by an unaltered “Star Trek: First Contact” in 1994, and perhaps a final TNG movie in 1996, directed by Nicholas Meyer, giving us a trilogy with the new crew. This could conclude the series just in time for the franchise’s 30th anniversary, and end it with a “lucky 7” number of installments, instead of 10, which went on two movies too long.
I know such hypothetical talk is moot in this reality, but I can’t help but fantasize about a more fitting end to the original movie franchise featuring the casts handpicked by Rodenberry himself. Can anyone else imagine the franchise going in this direction? How about differently? If Star Trek IV had been the last big screen appearance for Kirk and crew by themselves, how would you have liked to see the series progress post Star Trek IV?
I know a lot of you love Star Trek VI and I have a lot of admiration for it too. I admit that it was cool to see the origin of the Klingon alliance we see in the 24th century Star Trek shows. I enjoyed the villain’s over-the-top performance. Most importantly, I got a really nice feeling of closure and emotional satisfaction from Kirk’s monologue at the end seeming to symbolically “pass the torch” to the TNG crew. However, I still think we wouldn’t be much worse off if that movie had never been made. After my recent viewing of "Star Trek IV" ended, I started wondering what it would be like if the movie franchise had gone differently from there.
I started to wish we’d only had four movies with the original crew, none of which were terrible. I started to wish Star Trek V had been a re-tooled “Yesterday’s Enterprise” - maybe released circa 1990, still titled “Star Trek: Generations”, as the name would still make sense with that story. It could have then been followed by an unaltered “Star Trek: First Contact” in 1994, and perhaps a final TNG movie in 1996, directed by Nicholas Meyer, giving us a trilogy with the new crew. This could conclude the series just in time for the franchise’s 30th anniversary, and end it with a “lucky 7” number of installments, instead of 10, which went on two movies too long.
I know such hypothetical talk is moot in this reality, but I can’t help but fantasize about a more fitting end to the original movie franchise featuring the casts handpicked by Rodenberry himself. Can anyone else imagine the franchise going in this direction? How about differently? If Star Trek IV had been the last big screen appearance for Kirk and crew by themselves, how would you have liked to see the series progress post Star Trek IV?