On other posts, most (definitely not all) have ranked ST'09 highly, although commonly below II, VI and/or VIII. Generally good/great, but not necessarily the absolute best.
Conversely, the 96% 'Fresh Tomatoes' speaks to how highly this flick was regarded by the, shall we say, 'general community'.
It seems to me that while both, trekkies(ers) and non-trekkies generally think this is a great movie, the general critics thought of it even higher than trek fans.
As a longtime fans I have some definite quibbles with the movie. I would certainly put it in the top 4, but would probably keep it below II, VI and/or VIII. Still, I thouroughly enjoyed it.
So, forgiving resets, scientific inaccuracies, contradictions, nitpicks and the likes, the beauty of the movie is how much it has re-penetrated the culture, something later incarnations of Trek were unable to do. For this I am grateful. Are you?
Conversely, the 96% 'Fresh Tomatoes' speaks to how highly this flick was regarded by the, shall we say, 'general community'.
It seems to me that while both, trekkies(ers) and non-trekkies generally think this is a great movie, the general critics thought of it even higher than trek fans.
As a longtime fans I have some definite quibbles with the movie. I would certainly put it in the top 4, but would probably keep it below II, VI and/or VIII. Still, I thouroughly enjoyed it.
So, forgiving resets, scientific inaccuracies, contradictions, nitpicks and the likes, the beauty of the movie is how much it has re-penetrated the culture, something later incarnations of Trek were unable to do. For this I am grateful. Are you?