Wasn't that the whole set-up of the show? It feels kinda unresolved.
Anyone agrees?
Anyone agrees?
Wasn't that the whole set-up of the show? It feels kinda unresolved.
Anyone agrees?
I have to agree. I think they let the war overtake the main premise of the show. However I also think by that stage in the series it had sufficiently shown a world of grey in which joining the Federation was no longer seen as an absolute good- that in many ways Bajor was better 'standing on it's own'.
My impression has always been that the ONLY reason Bajor's entry into the Federation was - for a time - considered "not good for Bajor" was because as full-on UFP members, Bajor would have been flattened by the Dominion when the war began and Starfleet was driven from DS9. This was what Mad Prophet Sisko's voices were warning him about in "Rapture"I have to agree. I think they let the war overtake the main premise of the show. However I also think by that stage in the series it had sufficiently shown a world of grey in which joining the Federation was no longer seen as an absolute good- that in many ways Bajor was better 'standing on it's own'.
Uh... because joining the Federation does not mean one's culture becomes "subordinate"? When has that ever been shown to be the case? Bajor didn't "have to" do anything; they petitioned for membership and invited the Federation to administer DS9 as part of that process. You make it sound as if for Bajor to remain a partner of - but NOT a member of - the Federation would somehow be better for both parties, when in fact the opposite is true (assuming Bajor wants membership and the UFP wants to let them in, and we know both of those things to be the case from watching the show).This is exactly the point I was going to make. Why should Bajor have to subordinate its independent, distinct culture to the Federation when both parties can enjoy the benefits of being trading and strategic partners without that step?
That's true, but the reason I used the word "lost" is because I would bet that the intention of the creators was not to just let it go, never revisiting the "Bajor joins the UFP" plotline after "Rapture." Rather, it just sort of happened. All those other plotlines gained so much steam, that they just didn't have time for it.I wouldn't say it got lost, but that goal wasn't as immediately important as the war arch and the character stories they'd been setting up. It had taken a backseat to the Dominion War and other smaller events that sprung up because of it, and I think trying to wrap up with Bajor joining the UFP along with the rest of What You Leave Behind would've come off as forced and rushed.
I'm happy with how the show ended (the final seasons in general and WYLB specifically).
Wasn't that the whole set-up of the show? It feels kinda unresolved.
Anyone agrees?
Uh... because joining the Federation does not mean one's culture becomes "subordinate"? When has that ever been shown to be the case?
Wasn't that the whole set-up of the show? It feels kinda unresolved.
Anyone agrees?
Uh... because joining the Federation does not mean one's culture becomes "subordinate"? When has that ever been shown to be the case?
It did come up quite a bit on the show. Kira was initially anti-Fed, there were terrorist organizations like the Circle that were anti-Fed, the Bajorans were going to re-institute a caste system that would prevent them from joining the Federation, Sisko foresaw that Bajor would be destroyed if it joined the Federation, the Maquis was a Bajor-heavy terrorist organization that was in almost open war with the Federation... joining the Federation may have been Sisko's mission at the beginning, but I'd say seven years later he probably loved Bajor more than he loved the Federation.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.