• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Rockman in STV

It doesnt matter if the suit looked good or not, the whole idea of "God" creating rockmen to chase Shatner up a cliff shows how creatively unimaginative the movie was.

RAMA
 
And I bet those things crease and fold all over the place. That's the trouble with "rock", it doesn't flex, which makes flexible rock creatures an oxymoron.

Actually, all things considered (that it was a cheap show and they only had a few days to make 'em out of rubber), they came out pretty good. Not as much creasing and folding as one might think. A lot of shots really came off. Irwin Allen had some of the best monsters on TV (and, granted, some of the worst as well).

It doesnt matter if the suit looked good or not, the whole idea of "God" creating rockmen to chase Shatner up a cliff shows how creatively unimaginative the movie was.

RAMA

Well, to be fair, they were originally "furies" from Hell, which became Rockmen due to the expense, which became one Rockman, which then became bad blobby special effect. Shatner's imagination was too much for the budget.
 
I think The Shat really understand the "it" factor of TOS better than Bennett, Meyer, Wise, and even Nimoy.

Which is why if it wasn't for the 25th Anniversary of Star Trek, The Final Frontier would have killed the film franchise. The "it" factor is overrated.

In regards to the Rockman, they're ok. Not theatrical movie quality, but they'll do on any other production. The issue I have with the suit is that it looks incredibly bulky. It just doesn't look intimidating since almost anyone can outrun it.
 
The rockman suit itself looks completely badass. The only thing that could be better on it is if they put lighting in all the body's crevaces and made it into a magma monster.

The thing that makes it look cheesy is the actor's robotic, lumbering movements. If he moved around more swiftly and fluidly it'd look many times better.
 
Maybe it would have been a better movie if they fired Shatner and hired the rockman to direct.


In fact, I'm certain of it...

RAMA
 
Therin you just made me so disappointed that I checked out this thread to see the latest reply!
 
I really don't think he did. His idea of "it" was all-Shatner, all of the time.
You really think so? Because I think TFF gave plenty of other cast members a time to shine. In particular, I think DeForest Kelley as Dr. McCoy produced some of his best work of the entire franchise with the scene involving the death of McCoy's father. I thought the chemistry of "the big 3" was captured better in this film than in any other.

And though the film is often criticized for some of the humor being at the expense of the lesser characters, even they got their moments. Uhura actually got to pilot a shuttle and be involved in an action sequence for once. Chekov got to command the Enterprise. Scotty has several moments to shine. And Sulu gets some good action sequences during the Paradise City raid.

And let's not forget the fantastic and memorable performance of guest star Laurence Luckinbill, who was fantastic as Sybok.

Even Nichelle Nichols, a noted and vocal Shatner hater, says in her book "Beyond Uhura," that Shatner was a wonderful director and during TFF actually, for the first time, became a part of the team and a part of the family. She hypothesizes that since he was actually, officially the guy in charge, he didn't feel he had to always be "flexing his muscles," so to speak, in an attempt to assert his importance.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top