He probably wanted them to all be unique.The bit I don't get is that Shatner wanted a swarm of Rockmen but couldn't afford that many, and in the end only money for one Rockman suit. Why would he need several suits? Couldn't they composite one effect many times over, like they did with TOS Enterprise model in "The Ultimate Computer"? If they could do that TV effect in the 60s, I'd think that same effect could be done for films in the 80s.
I really don't think he did. His idea of "it" was all-Shatner, all of the time.He probably wanted them to all be unique.The bit I don't get is that Shatner wanted a swarm of Rockmen but couldn't afford that many, and in the end only money for one Rockman suit. Why would he need several suits? Couldn't they composite one effect many times over, like they did with TOS Enterprise model in "The Ultimate Computer"? If they could do that TV effect in the 60s, I'd think that same effect could be done for films in the 80s.
I think The Shat really understand the "it" factor of TOS better than Bennett, Meyer, Wise, and even Nimoy.
He probably wanted them to all be unique.The bit I don't get is that Shatner wanted a swarm of Rockmen but couldn't afford that many, and in the end only money for one Rockman suit. Why would he need several suits? Couldn't they composite one effect many times over, like they did with TOS Enterprise model in "The Ultimate Computer"? If they could do that TV effect in the 60s, I'd think that same effect could be done for films in the 80s.
I think The Shat really understand the "it" factor of TOS better than Bennett, Meyer, Wise, and even Nimoy.
He doesn't get enough credit for it.
Don't want to turn this into another TFF flame war, but my point is it captured the charm, nuance and aura of TOS better than any of the other five films. The Rockman is sort of the epitome of that.
The Rockman makes me think of what The Thing would've looked like had they made a live-action Fantastic Four film in the '80s.
The Rockman makes me think of what The Thing would've looked like had they made a live-action Fantastic Four film in the '80s.
(Don't deny it, I bet some of you were thinking the same thing....)
And I bet those things crease and fold all over the place. That's the trouble with "rock", it doesn't flex, which makes flexible rock creatures an oxymoron.Jeez, he should have gone to the King of the American Sci-Fi Monsters, Irwin Allen. He was still alive then. Irwin had a bunch of Rockmen on Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea.
![]()
This was back in 1966, too. They cranked out four of five of these on a fraction of the money and Shatner couldn't handle one? Ah well.
Johnny Storm is really rockin' that pornstache.The Rockman makes me think of what The Thing would've looked like had they made a live-action Fantastic Four film in the '80s.
1994 actually:
Fantastic Four (1994) by Therin of Andor, on Flickr
You mean the guy who also played an alien in VOY's "Basics Part 2"?
http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Michael_Bailey_Smith
with VOY's Mortimer Harren, even ("Good Shepherd"): actor Jay Underwood as Johnny Storm!
http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Jay_Underwood
Or there was my effort of 1986, using papier mache and orange rubber gloves:
Fantastic Four (1986) by Therin of Andor, on Flickr
That's me as Mr. Fantastic, btw.
Johnny Storm is really rockin' that pornstache.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.