Sure, there are similarities between Simon and James, but Kingsman is very much a riff on Bond, which I think it slightly differentComing straight off of The Saint didn't affect Roger Moore's casting.
Sure, there are similarities between Simon and James, but Kingsman is very much a riff on Bond, which I think it slightly differentComing straight off of The Saint didn't affect Roger Moore's casting.
Coming straight off of The Saint didn't affect Roger Moore's casting.
I’m not sure that’s quite right - there were already numerous takes on The Saint (him again), Tarzan and others. Though I suppose those were usually unrelated adaptations of the characters, rather than a specific series in the way the Bond movies were, even if continuity wasn’t a massive issue for them in the 1960s.I think it probably helped Moore. Audiences had seen him as The Saint and knew what sort of an acting style he would bring to the role of Bond.
Audiences didn't know Lazenby, so they didn't know how he was going to portray the character of Bond after Connery.
Nowadays, we're used to roles being recast in films and television, back then, the only time a role would be recast was usually on a soap opera.
serenity now... serenity now....!!!He's not perfect (Serenity?!)
Just saw this news on io9. I wonder if he'll have to tone his usual style as seen in Peaky Blinders and Taboo (I guess this means we'll never get a series two...)? This also reminds me that I still need to watch The Veil.
Edited to add: The rumors about Cillian Murphy as the new James Bond begins...now (regardless of age, interest, right fit, etc.).
Likewise Tom Hardy as a villain...and gods, I need that one to become true.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.