As the other thread was closed, with a gross misunderstanding as the final post by the moderator - I never claimed men are a minority, only that there would be men within minority groups: "minority men" - I'll post this example of the same kind of interpretivist approach to a professor's syllabus here to discuss.
There an entirely neutral phrase relating to effort in class was considered as a prelude to sexual harassment.
The same subjective interpretation with which the analysis was conducted could have led to real consequences here, but luckily didn't.
There an entirely neutral phrase relating to effort in class was considered as a prelude to sexual harassment.
The same subjective interpretation with which the analysis was conducted could have led to real consequences here, but luckily didn't.