I remember reading in "The World of Star Trek", a book written in the 1980s by TOS writer David Gerrold, that he objected to the Starship Enterprise being used for an espionage mission in "The Enterprise Incident", comparing it to the 1968 Pueblo Incident, in which the U.S.S. Pueblo was captured after being caught spying on North Korea.
"The Enterprise Incident" was framed around the perceived necessity of the Federation aggressively responding to the Romulans (1: introducing a newer, more powerful cloaking device that made Starfleet tracking devices of the day useless, thus leaving the Federation extremely vulnerable; and (2: the Romulans entering some kind of deal to acquire Klingon starships to populate the technologically limited Romulan fleet of the day. Apparently, the combination of these two developments compelled the Federation to action.
Obviously, a case could be made that the Pueblo was caught red-handed, and that Gerrold and other critics found this unacceptable. But does "The Enterprise Incident" compare?
It would seem to me that if one took the TOS episode and compared it to the Pueblo Incident, one would have to wonder how the North Koreans of 1968 could be seen as enough of a threat to justify risking the U.S.S. Pueblo. Clearly the Enterprise crossed the Romulan Neutral Zone without immediate cause, a deliberate provocation and an act of war under the subspace radio treaty negotiated over 100 years before, according to Spock in "Balance of Terror". But the Romulans seemed to be at work as well, cultivating a new and very dangerous threat. Indeed, the new Romulan threat was confirmed by the rapid capture of the Enterprise by Klingon-designed Romulan ships which appeared out of nowhere.
I would say that if TOS were to make an episode about the Pueblo Incident, it would have to be written very differently than "The Enterprise Incident". Indeed, the whole story would have to be framed differently. I think Ronald D. Moore did this in 1989 with "The Defector", a very grim counterpoint to "The Enterprise Incident". (Moore's story relied heavily upon Klingon allies who used cloaked ships to assist the Enterprise; this would not be possible in TOS, unless either the Federation developed its own cloaking device or found an ally who had one.)
The only other way TOS could have conceptually made an ep that would be a more reasonable allegory to the Pueblo Incident would be if the Enterprise was first involved in picking up the captured crew of some other Federation starship from the Romulans, and then embarking on an espionage mission. It could be said that the captured crew was released but not their starship, and that the Romulans used their new device to effect the capture. This would tip-off the Federation about the new Romulan cloaking device.
The shaky elements about "The Enterprise Incident" that is glaring to me are not the Romulans, their device, or the espionage. It is (1: Kirk's over-the-top contrived insanity and "I'll kill you!" silliness, and (2: What's up with Romulan arousal over Spock. Have the Vulcans discovered that Romulans are hot for their Vulcan cousins? Or does the female Romulan Commander have issues? Apparently there are Vulcan operatives working behind the scenes that new about the device, and the Romulan-Vulcan mystique.
D.C. Fontana distanced herself from this episode, making fun of everything from the size of the Romulan device to the interracial romance.
Was this episode really that bad, or did it diverge so far from the Pueblo Incident that "The Defector" would be a more appropriate allegory?
"The Enterprise Incident" was framed around the perceived necessity of the Federation aggressively responding to the Romulans (1: introducing a newer, more powerful cloaking device that made Starfleet tracking devices of the day useless, thus leaving the Federation extremely vulnerable; and (2: the Romulans entering some kind of deal to acquire Klingon starships to populate the technologically limited Romulan fleet of the day. Apparently, the combination of these two developments compelled the Federation to action.
Obviously, a case could be made that the Pueblo was caught red-handed, and that Gerrold and other critics found this unacceptable. But does "The Enterprise Incident" compare?
It would seem to me that if one took the TOS episode and compared it to the Pueblo Incident, one would have to wonder how the North Koreans of 1968 could be seen as enough of a threat to justify risking the U.S.S. Pueblo. Clearly the Enterprise crossed the Romulan Neutral Zone without immediate cause, a deliberate provocation and an act of war under the subspace radio treaty negotiated over 100 years before, according to Spock in "Balance of Terror". But the Romulans seemed to be at work as well, cultivating a new and very dangerous threat. Indeed, the new Romulan threat was confirmed by the rapid capture of the Enterprise by Klingon-designed Romulan ships which appeared out of nowhere.
I would say that if TOS were to make an episode about the Pueblo Incident, it would have to be written very differently than "The Enterprise Incident". Indeed, the whole story would have to be framed differently. I think Ronald D. Moore did this in 1989 with "The Defector", a very grim counterpoint to "The Enterprise Incident". (Moore's story relied heavily upon Klingon allies who used cloaked ships to assist the Enterprise; this would not be possible in TOS, unless either the Federation developed its own cloaking device or found an ally who had one.)
The only other way TOS could have conceptually made an ep that would be a more reasonable allegory to the Pueblo Incident would be if the Enterprise was first involved in picking up the captured crew of some other Federation starship from the Romulans, and then embarking on an espionage mission. It could be said that the captured crew was released but not their starship, and that the Romulans used their new device to effect the capture. This would tip-off the Federation about the new Romulan cloaking device.
The shaky elements about "The Enterprise Incident" that is glaring to me are not the Romulans, their device, or the espionage. It is (1: Kirk's over-the-top contrived insanity and "I'll kill you!" silliness, and (2: What's up with Romulan arousal over Spock. Have the Vulcans discovered that Romulans are hot for their Vulcan cousins? Or does the female Romulan Commander have issues? Apparently there are Vulcan operatives working behind the scenes that new about the device, and the Romulan-Vulcan mystique.
D.C. Fontana distanced herself from this episode, making fun of everything from the size of the Romulan device to the interracial romance.
Was this episode really that bad, or did it diverge so far from the Pueblo Incident that "The Defector" would be a more appropriate allegory?