• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

the dumb questions you were afraid to ask thread

Flying Spaghetti Monster

Vice Admiral
Admiral
ever have those questions you think you should know the answers to but were afraid to ask. ok well dont worry about being stupid. maybe we can allk help each other out.

Here's mine:

What is Kirk's favorite author? Chang quoted him, so I'm guessing its either Dickens (ST2) or Shakespear.. (chang quotes him often). I'm not familiar with the line quoted. plase help
 
I'm pretty sure we've never actually found out who Kirk's favourite author is.

Chang's line in TUC was more of a taunt from someone he'd just meet and I'm pretty sure Chang was being facetious. Plus since Kirk was about the only one at the dinner scene not quoting Shakespeare I'd say there's little evidence that the Bard is Jim's favourite. That's not to say he couldn't be, but we have very little evidence of it.

As to Spock's gift of The Tale of Two Cities in TWOK, it seems to me the book was more likely one of Spock's favourites, although Kirk does seem familiar with it at least going by his comments.

Although this is simply going by the movies, there could be a TOS episode in which Kirk says he's really into Stephen King that I'm forgetting.
 
The line quoted ("Let us sit upon the ground and tell sad stories of the death of kings") is from Shakespeare (Richard II, Act 3, Scene 2 - thanks Wiki!). I can imagine Shakespeare being Jim Kirk's favorite author. He always did love a good soliloquy. :)
 
It's never been said one way or the other (onscreen) if Romulans are as physically strong as Vulcans, although judging by the few fisticuffs we've seen regular humans engage in with the sneaky bastards I'd say they're not.


It's been suggested (keep in mind, I'm no science wizz, so I may be getting some things wrong here) that the reason Vulcans are about three times as strong as humans is because of the conditions that they evolved in on their home-world, coupled with the fact that when comparing the signs of their strength they have the advantage of being in a lighter gravity than they're used to as well as a thicker atmosphere, thus more oxygen for them to breath. When humans have taken on Vulcans on the planet Vulcan it's been said they are decidedly disadvantaged because of the gravity and lower oxygen levels (Super-Surak-Katra-holder-Archer being the obvious exception).

Romulus appears to be a much more fertile world than Vulcan has been depicted as, possibly with a thicker atmosphere, lighter gravity and not nearly as rugged conditions. It's possible that after several generations living on this new world the Romulans became more 'acclimatised' (loss of muscle density, smaller lung capacity, etc) to the environment and lost the advantage their cousins the Vulcans have from growing up on a world as poorly constructed as Vulcan. ;) Of course evolutionary differences such as the Vulcan inner eyelid would probably still be present. This is, of course, pure speculation.

As for the Cardassian neck-trick: I know what it is, but I'm not telling. :devil:
 
That was always my impression as well. Another possibility is that he could make his "neck cords" undulate in a pleasing pattern. Maybe there's a Cardassian parallel to the Ferengi oo-mox that we don't know about.
 
In DS9, when Thomas Riker (not Will) meets O'Brien, it seems there is some friction between them. But why? What happpened?
 
Oh dear, better nip this in the bud before some regular poster, annoyed at this question coming up again, comes along.

The reason Tom was such an asshole to O'Brien is that he was impersonating Will at the time and knew the chief could give the game away if he got into chatting with him. So, to get rid of him quickly, he acted all miffed and pissy towards O'Brien, which obviously worked since he hightails it outta there pretty quick, but with a very :confused: expression on his face.
 
Agreed on the riker/o'brien thing.


Okay... in All Good things, they all talk about the anamoly and how Big E's from each period started it. However in the future the medical ship actually started it. Picard even says this, but seems just as confused as the scriptwriters. what do you make of it?

How do those guy with that column running from nose to chin eat?


In Starship Mine, the ship goes a sweep which would kill anything living but leaves the ship and all of its contents perfectly intact. wouldnt this amke the perfect weapon? Why hasn't it been used?

How did McCoy emulate Spock's voice in ST3.

Whgy arent the tribbles reproducing in ST3?

Why does McCoy pronounce the name of Spock's pet so radically differently then Amanda when she jut told him whta it was for the first time in Journey to Babel?


How can two people stand in th Holodeck frther apart from each other than the size of the roon? (this is one that has always baffled me) in other wiords, how can one person be 100 feet away from the guy that enters the room when the room is onle 25 feet square?

At what point during the Farpoint mission do you think Data told Geordi the joke about the Ferengi in the clown suit?

Why would a race keep its reproductive organs on its knees?

Why, oh why, does it take three yeard and one of the most advanced starships ever built to explore and catalogue gaseous anamolies?


Why is it that in Flashback, the explosion happens and then it seems that Kirk's mission started right after that, but in the film, two months had passed?

So what is the real number of moons and planets in the Bajoran system?


Why is it that we've only seen the Bajoran Sun ONCE (from space? you think if it lights up the station so we can see how pretty is, it would be visible in one of the windows?

Does the station and wormhole orbit this star?
 
YYZ said:
How can two people stand in th Holodeck frther apart from each other than the size of the roon? (this is one that has always baffled me) in other wiords, how can one person be 100 feet away from the guy that enters the room when the room is onle 25 feet square?
As described in the Shatner novel 'Star Trek: Avenger' basically the holodeck floor can act as a sort of treadmill, to give the user the impression they're walking for miles if need be, when in fact they're still just in the Holodeck room.
And as for seeing someone else in the holodeck from far away, but they're both still in the same little room; forcefields and holographic impressions are placed between the two users, to provide the viewpoint of them being far away from each other, when in fact they're closer than they think
 
i buy the treadmill idea for ONE person, but the explanation for two people is pretty thin

Why? Why should the treadmill be one huge rubber belt, when a forcefield could act as a hundred separate tiny treadmills for a hundred adventurous/bored gerbils that have holodeck credits to spare?

Okay... in All Good things, they all talk about the anamoly and how Big E's from each period started it. However in the future the medical ship actually started it. Picard even says this, but seems just as confused as the scriptwriters. what do you make of it?

Depends on which scan started the anomaly. Note that the Riker-commanded future E-D does eventually arrive at the anomaly (which seems to expand towards the future just as much as it expands towards the past) and senses the tiny antitime anomaly. Perhaps it used an inverse tachyon beam to sense it, thereby "fulfilling the prophecy", before Picard began jumping from time to time and telling everybody to shut their beams down.

Of course, the real-world reason is that the script originally omitted the hospital ship and had the future Picard steal the retired E-D from a museum, then use her for creating the future beam. The script was then partially changed, but not entirely.

But the script sort of works even as finished. Just after Picard and Data realize that three Enterprises are creating the anomaly, action jumps to a scene where the future LaForge speaks admiringly of the future E-D - suggestively enough! ("So this is the third piece in the three-piece puzzle, in case you didn't realize it yet, get it, get it, huh?")

How do those guy with that column running from nose to chin eat?

Depends on whether they eat at all, I guess. It's not as they have teeth or anything. "Conventional" human mouths are far from standard even here on real Earth, really. And this Fallit Kot guy is never seen eating in "Melora".

In "Starship Mine", the ship goes a sweep which would kill anything living but leaves the ship and all of its contents perfectly intact. wouldnt this amke the perfect weapon? Why hasn't it been used?

Because it requires placing a giant framework around the enemy vessel?

How did McCoy emulate Spock's voice in ST3.

Very well.

Why arent the tribbles reproducing in ST3?

Who says they aren't?

Why does McCoy pronounce the name of Spock's pet so radically differently then Amanda when she jut told him what it was for the first time in "Journey to Babel"?

Because he's drunk as a skunk most of the time. That's no Southern drawl - he was actually born in Michigan.

Why would a race keep its reproductive organs on its knees?

Easy access? It doesn't make much sense to keep them between one's legs, either, when they are still hanging on the outside and vulnerable to just about anything. But nature isn't very smart - it never aims at anything beyond the barely adequate.

Why, oh why, does it take three yeard and one of the most advanced starships ever built to explore and catalogue gaseous anamolies?

Why not?

Anyway, Sulu never claims the cataloguing took three years. He only says that he's completed that mission after three years. Who knows what else he was doing at the time? (At least befriending Kang, apparently - it's unlikely the Klingon would be that familiar with him on basis of "Day of the Dove" alone.)

Why is it that in "Flashback", the explosion happens and then it seems that Kirk's mission started right after that, but in the film, two months had passed?

Because we see it through the eyes of Tuvok, and it's a pretty big plot point that Tuvok is losing his mind!

So what is the real number of moons and planets in the Bajoran system?

Canonically, at least eight planets; backstage says eleven. And since we know there's a fifth moon, Nog must simply have been his usual illiterate self when stammering "three". ;)

Why is it that we've only seen the Bajoran Sun ONCE (from space? you think if it lights up the station so we can see how pretty is, it would be visible in one of the windows?

Probably. But it seems the station is twice as far out from the star as Bajor is (travel time cues, plus the distance cue from "Emissary"), meaning that the sun is that much dimmer. And no doubt the windows dim it out even further on the sunny side, for convenience.

Does the station and wormhole orbit this star?

Most probably. Otherwise, the station would have to keep firing its engines in order to stay put. And if the station orbits the sun at twice the distance of Bajor, it would make perfect sense that transit time via impulse-speed runabout would vary between two and six hours, as indicated.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Ethros said:
YYZ said:
How can two people stand in th Holodeck frther apart from each other than the size of the roon? (this is one that has always baffled me) in other wiords, how can one person be 100 feet away from the guy that enters the room when the room is onle 25 feet square?
As described in the Shatner novel 'Star Trek: Avenger' basically the holodeck floor can act as a sort of treadmill, to give the user the impression they're walking for miles if need be, when in fact they're still just in the Holodeck room.

I buy it. It's one of the only ways TNG's episode "Homeward" would work.
 
Frodo Lives said:
Oh dear, better nip this in the bud before some regular poster, annoyed at this question coming up again, comes along.

The reason Tom was such an asshole to O'Brien is that he was impersonating Will at the time and knew the chief could give the game away if he got into chatting with him. So, to get rid of him quickly, he acted all miffed and pissy towards O'Brien, which obviously worked since he hightails it outta there pretty quick, but with a very :confused: expression on his face.

Aha. Makes sense. I just never pictured O'Brien as the type who could be shooed off like that.
Thanks.
 
darthvincor said:
Frodo Lives said:
Oh dear, better nip this in the bud before some regular poster, annoyed at this question coming up again, comes along.

The reason Tom was such an asshole to O'Brien is that he was impersonating Will at the time and knew the chief could give the game away if he got into chatting with him. So, to get rid of him quickly, he acted all miffed and pissy towards O'Brien, which obviously worked since he hightails it outta there pretty quick, but with a very :confused: expression on his face.

Aha. Makes sense. I just never pictured O'Brien as the type who could be shooed off like that.
Thanks.

Funny thing is, while this is the obvious explanation, you'll still find tons of people in the DS9 forum looking for another answer. People are fascinating and by fascinating I mean--

Never mind. :D

(As for O'Brien being shooed off: Riker is his superior by a half dozen or so steps in rank. O'Brien is, above all else, a good soldier. Riker says sahoo, he shoos.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top