The degredation of script writing and filmmaking

[john titor]

Post proof or retract.

That should read post proof or retract.

Yeah, you sure screwed it up in your edit. No one was fooled.

I would if I had a scanner, but seriously if you have problems believing that stfu, cos[sic] I've got nothing to prove.

In fact, given the meager nature of your contributions here the burden of proof is entirely on you.

Hey I've given plenty of proof, if it doesn't satisfy you, you Dennis the center of the universe, then it doesn't boether me.

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Who is to say you didn't immediately edit it after I had posted the corrections?1[sic]

If that's a "pissing contest" you have going there, you're losing.

Hey I've given plenty of proof, if it doesn't satisfy you, you Dennis the center of the universe, then it doesn't boether[sic] me.

No, you've offered none at all nor have you displayed any notable reasoning ability or the temperment to engage successfully in any debate.

It's spelled "bother" - making the mistake once might be a typo or carelessness, making the same mistake twice means that you need to learn how to spell the word. Are basic standards of English literacy not valued at Harvard? I understood otherwise.

 

[john titor]

hey my post count is going up fast. YUH! I'm the JT!

 

[john titor]

Who is to say you didn't immediately edit it after I had posted the corrections?1[sic]

If that's a "pissing contest" you have going there, you're losing.

you're damn right Im losing

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

We've reached agreement on something, anyway.

 

[cardinal biggles]

You know, if this stays open, it could, in time, become as good as a Madbaggins thread.

Only if he misspells his cousin's name while boinking her.

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

You know, if this stays open, it could, in time, become as good as a Madbaggins thread.

Only if he misspells his cousin's name while boinking her.

Ouch, I'll bet the cousin didn't appreciate that. Only thing worse would have been calling out his sister's name in the heat of passion.

 

[John Picard]

You know, if this stays open, it could, in time, become as good as a Madbaggins thread.

Only if he misspells his cousin's name while boinking her.

While falling in love with his male friend, but not quite being "that gay".

 

[Top41]

re: Dennis' reply—

Filmmakers who had pushed the envelope in the 60s were probably airing the same gripes about the films of the 80s and 90s (if they weren't making them themselves).

As for your praise of Tim Burton's Batman, I don't see how Burton having Keaton play Bruce Wayne as "quirky" somehow makes this a better take on the role than Christian Bale, or makes Batman a better superhero than Iron Man. Wayne and Stark are both ridiculously rich, but because Keaton's Bruce is a quirky eccentric haunted by the death of his parents, while Tony is just an alcoholic douchebag, it somehow makes him "better." That might be an interesting premise to work from if Burton didn't give us Batman, and then turn the rest of the film over to his villains. Honestly, the films are dominated by the bad guys (though in fairness to Keaton, he at least holds up his own end well, unlike Kilmer, who wasn't even trying).

Oh lol, its asshats like you who are retarding the development of the human race based on that response, I'll let you figure it out yourself though being an idiot you'll probably fail. I couldn't be bothered arguing with a groupthinker chimp.

I know this will be shocking--shocking!--but you have a warning for flaming.

Even more shocking... this thread is closed. Sorry to ruin the fun before we got to the cousin-boinking.

CLOSED.