Anyone see it? Whadja think?
Better than I expected - and watching it on DVD solves the it's-too-long problem that I heard so many complaints about. Just split it into two viewings. I see how the beginning was maybe too leisurely, but all that stuff was necessary to set up the assassination so I don't see what could have been cut.
Loved Casey Affleck (but why did he get a Supporting Actor nomination? wasn't he the lead?) and Brad Pitt certainly did a convincing job as a very disturbed yet charming individual.
The idea that someone could commit murder (I don't think any court would accept that scenario as self-defense) and then go on stage and re-enact the scene hundreds of times is pretty amazing.
Can you see that happening today? Gotta love the 19th C.
So why did Jesse take off his guns, knowing what the outcome would be? Did he come to the conclusion that if he's such a nutcase he can't even hang onto the loyalty of two dimwitted underlings, one of whom is practically an obsessed stalker, he might as well just pack it in?
Better than I expected - and watching it on DVD solves the it's-too-long problem that I heard so many complaints about. Just split it into two viewings. I see how the beginning was maybe too leisurely, but all that stuff was necessary to set up the assassination so I don't see what could have been cut.
Loved Casey Affleck (but why did he get a Supporting Actor nomination? wasn't he the lead?) and Brad Pitt certainly did a convincing job as a very disturbed yet charming individual.
The idea that someone could commit murder (I don't think any court would accept that scenario as self-defense) and then go on stage and re-enact the scene hundreds of times is pretty amazing.

So why did Jesse take off his guns, knowing what the outcome would be? Did he come to the conclusion that if he's such a nutcase he can't even hang onto the loyalty of two dimwitted underlings, one of whom is practically an obsessed stalker, he might as well just pack it in?