• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Adventures of Tintin review thread

How do you rate The Adventures of Tintin?


  • Total voters
    28

The Nth Doctor

Wanderer in the Fourth Dimension
Premium Member
Wow, I'm disappointed that there's no review thread for this film, especially considering I know I wasn't the only person on this board who's been anxiously awaiting this film since it was first announced several years ago.

Fortunately, I wasn't disappointed by the film. As a Tintinophile, I freely admit I went in with high expectations, and while it wasn't as good as I hoped it would be, it wasn't dismal as I feared. What the film excelled in was capturing the spirit of the characters and the adventure of the story (with plenty of small references to many of the albums), and that alone made it worth the price of admission.

As much as I love the antics of Simon Pegg and Nick Frost in Spaced and their "The Three Flavours Cornetto" trilogy, I was a bit worried about their casting as the bumbling detectives, Thompson and Thomson. Suffice to say, I loved their performance and I actually had actively listen to their voices to discern who was who, which I can say is only a good thing. There was exactly the right amount of their slapstick and absentminded comedy routine throughout the film and I was especially happy to see the elastic wallet sequence.

Andy Serkis was also well fitted as Captain Archibald Haddock and I disagree with reviews that said he wasn't coarse and rough-voiced enough. Firstly, he was plenty of coarse and rough-voiced, and while it wasn't as much as he is in the later albums, what we see in the film is very closely to how Haddaock is in his first album, The Crab of the Golden Claws (which is one of three stories the film adapted from).

This brings me to Tintin. Tintin is a difficult character to adapt because of his boyish and ambiguous nature, and although I was mildly reminded of Elijah Wood in certain parts, I felt Jamie Bell did as best of a job that anyone could do with the character.

And no, I didn't forget about Snowy. While I know it wasn't practical for the film, I did miss Snowy's sarcastic comments, but Spielberg and Jackson did a wonderful job in capturing Snowy's character, whether he was saving Tintin from a tough scrap or getting himself in trouble because his fondness food, alcohol and chasing cats.

For as long as the production as been running, I was not happy about the lack of mention of Professor Calculus especially considering his first album, Red Rackham's Treasure, was one of the three stories being adapted. Now that I have seen the film, I can understand for his exclusion: The film draws primarily from The Secret of the Unicorn and only develops certain elements from The Crab with the Golden Claws and Red Rackham's Treasure. That being said, it was nice to see some of the smaller characters from the stories including Nestor, Allan, Mrs. Finch, Omar Ben Salaad (complete with the mispronunciation of his name as "salad"), and, yes, even Bianca Castafiore.

In regards to the adaptation, I must admit that it helped that the film adapted three of my lesser favorite albums. I know The Secret of the Unicorn and Red Rackham's Treasure are two fan favorites, but those two stories never really interested me, even though the former was the very first story I read when I was a child. It's been years since I've these two particular stories, so my memory of how well the stories were adapted is a bit limited, but I know there were some significant changes. By including The Crab of the Golden Claws, the film introduces one of my favorite elements of the Tintin series which is probably why I don't like the aforementioned duology as much as others (because it lacks this particular element): globetrotting.

Now, for the small things that made grin like a little boy: I loved the opening titles (and was pleasantly surprised that the low-key score was written by John "King of Bombastic" Williams) with all of its references to nearly, if not all, of the Tintin adventures. It was especially cool to frames from the albums themselves during particular sequence. I also loved spotting all of Tintin's visits on the airport ticker as well as newspaper clippings to Tintin's adventures prior to the film. And how wonderful of a way to open the film but to have a Hergé-looking artist painting Tintin portrait! Speaking of Hergé, I thought the film did a very good job in capture the artist's distinct style.

That all being said and done, there were definitely aspects of the film that I didn't like at all. There were far too many absurd, over-the-top action sequences that were nothing like Hergé's style (he certainly had some absurd moments, especially with Thompson and Thomson, but nothing on the level of the crane sequence). I also didn't like the major alteration of Ivan Ivanovitch Sakharine's character from a simple collector to an evil mastermind who just happens to be a descendant of Red Rackham and is seeking revenge against Haddock because of his ancestry (which is true to the stories), all for the sake of having a major to act against Tintin and Haddock.

While the film isn't as amazing as I or even bigger Tintin fans (there are some pretty scathing reviews out there) hoped for, the film does a good enough job for me to at least enjoy the adventure. And as this reviewer, as well as Tintinologist Michael Farr noted, the film will hopefully go a long way to increase interest in the Tintin series for years to come.
 
won't get a chance to see it till later in the week but i have been looking forward to this film for months. i grew up watching the cartoon back in the early 90s.
 
I haven't read a Tintin comic since I was 10 so I had no specific expectations and thought it was a very enjoyable film. It is a beautiful film and the three premier action scenes were fantastically over the top. The sea battle was just like a slight more over the top version of the final battle in POTC3 and the chase for the clues in the city made me think of the Uncharted games. Anyway, I gave it an "Excellent".
 
It's certainly not a hit in the U.S. Box office Mojo reports it made only $27,682,000 in it's first week of release here.

My summary of the film: removed from the constraints of live actors and physical cameras, Spielberg loses all sense of proportion and makes a film that has goes overboard on everything EXCEPT charm, style and comic timing.
 
There was a semi review thread Here in SF/F
Well, only I saw it I think. Posted my thoughts there. Basically it started off ok, but once they got to the desert it bored me to tears.
 
Well, no wonder I didn't see it. It was posted in the wrong forum with a typo in the name. :p
 
I just got back from it and loved it. It definitely wasn't perfect, but overall, it did a great job of capturing the spirit of the books, so I was pretty satisfied. My biggest quibble was that it was a little too over-the-top at points, and that the backstory of Sakharine was a little too coincidental. Oh, and I really wish there'd at least been a hint of the old theme from the TV adaptations. I loved that music.

Hopefully the film will do well enough in international markets to justify a sequel.
 
I knew of Tin Tin when I was in primary school, but not never a huge fan of it. Anyways tonight I decided to check it out. Loads of fun.
 
Just saw it tonight and loved it. I went in skeptical about it, and I have to say that the trailers really didn't do the movie justice, especially for the North American audience who for the most part aren't very aware of who or what Tintin is. Saw it in 3D and I thought it was the best use of 3D since Avatar. It felt very natural, and even the camera angles used the 3D to good effect, such as making us see reflections and making us feel like the person really is behind some glass. Everything was used to good effect, and it was a beautiful movie. Liked it quite a lot more than I thought I would. While I originally had reservations about the style and approach used for the characters, I think this is a case where stills just don't work. One really has to see it in motion to appreciate the detail and the style that went in to these characters. I was worried that it would approach the uncanny valley, but seeing things in motion made me realize that it just completely jumped over it. The movie had a realistic style to it while keeping its cartoonish nature and for the most part, I felt it worked. It's likely the most realistic animated movie that I've seen, but that's not a negative.
 
I took the nieces and nephews to see it; they all loved it. I liked it quite a bit. It was a tad slow in parts but it was generally very sweet and enjoyable.
 
Very good, close to great. I loved Haddock and felt this version of his and Tintin's meeting and Sakharine being a descendant of Rackham fit well. The humor was well-done as were most of the action scenes (though the final two were excessive back-to-back).
I was a bit disappointed at Calculus and the larger treasure not being included, especially as the film lacked a subtitle, and Allen had too little personality. I also would have liked more of a main theme and a more definite date (it seemed to be in the '30s except for the "Third World" comment).
My favorite comic was probably "Cigars of the Pharaoh"; they'll probably do "The Seven Crystal Balls"/"Prisoners of the Sun" (very good though the most like Indy) next, with the third set in South America also or Eastern Europe or focus on science fiction.
 
Hopefully the film will do well enough in international markets to justify a sequel.
The film is already done extremely well in the foreign markets, making well over $200 million in comparison to the US's measly $47 million. That's not a surprise, however, because Tintin is more well known in Europe than in the US.

they'll probably do "The Seven Crystal Balls"/"Prisoners of the Sun" (very good though the most like Indy) next, with the third set in South America also or Eastern Europe or focus on science fiction.
As of early November, Tintin sequel scriptwriter Anthony Horowitz said in a BBC article, that while he initially started working on a script based on The Seven Crystal Balls/Prisoners of the Sun, he's not certain now what the sequel will feature on but it won't be on that duology.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15553417
 
I finally saw Tin Tin today! I knew nothing about the source material.

I enjoyed it a lot. I just wish there were more astonishingly creative and amazing action sequences like the flooding city chase. That was absolutely incredible :eek: It's too bad the ending sequence wasn't stronger... I kept thinking this was the second to last set piece (cause they still had to go after the sunken wreck) but then they caught the bad guy and suddenly it was over!

They definitely overcame the uncanny valley with this one.
 
I saw it almost two months ago and I thought it was good although it felt more like a Haddock story than a Tintin centric story. Tintin felt a little too much like a support character rather than the lead and that made the film a little disappointing. Still, I liked the tone and the artistry used in the movie, it is all very much in line with the comic book adventures I used to read when I was a kid.

Coincidentally, I just watched Sherlock today and so I felt it necessary to point out that Steven Moffat does not disappoint in both Sherlock and Tintin. This year's DW arc and christmas special on the other hand was a little disappointing. I guess we now know where Moffat focused his attention.
 
From what I remember from seeing it (I also saw it almost two months ago) - my main problem was that so much of it was so real to life rather than taking advantage of cgi, I couldn't figure out why they didn't simply make it life action. It was passable if unmemorable fare.
 
From what I remember from seeing it (I also saw it almost two months ago) - my main problem was that so much of it was so real to life rather than taking advantage of cgi, I couldn't figure out why they didn't simply make it life action. It was passable if unmemorable fare.
They wanted to use CGI to mimic the style of Herge's art; and there are numerous sequences (particularly the Morocco one) which could never have been done in live action in the way they were.
 
One thing I felt was very misleading; all the trailers show that clip of the ship sailing through the desert, creating an ocean as it goes along, suggesting a fantastical/paranormal element to the story. But in reality that was just a transition technique and there was nothing supernatural whatsoever in the story. I was disappointed by that.
 
From what I remember from seeing it (I also saw it almost two months ago) - my main problem was that so much of it was so real to life rather than taking advantage of cgi, I couldn't figure out why they didn't simply make it life action. It was passable if unmemorable fare.
They wanted to use CGI to mimic the style of Herge's art; and there are numerous sequences (particularly the Morocco one) which could never have been done in live action in the way they were.


Yeah, in fact I think it's one of the best uses of CGI in bringing a realistic yet cartoony look to it.
 
My review (ten thousand thundering typhoons of spoilers ahead):



I finally got to see the movie today. Overall, tastefully handled in a manner that respects Herge's vision for Tintin while bringing it into the twenty-first centure, very enjoyable. But, it certainly didn't go without it's flaws, something which I will expound on.

The artistic style worked well in the way it bridged the gap between live photography, hand drawn animation and CGI. I'll always be a fan of the traditional style simply because that's what I grew up with, but the contemporary take on Tintin still had the appropriate feel and tone in the nuances of the colour and drawing. Mostly the same can be said for the voice acting, I grew to like it but it did take some adapting given my affinity for the Nelvana series from the early 1990s. I definitely prefer the older Haddock voice from this series rather than the current Scottish one they are going for. But Daniel Craig provided a terrific voice for his role.

If I had to really complain, it was more to do with the story telling. In short, the movie spends too much time telling, re-telling and clarifying basic plot points. In between all of this, while the action is generally good, the hand to hand fist fights are easily more interesting than the action scenes with the big explosions and complex (and humanly impossible) stunt driven fights. As you know, The Secret Of The Unicorn has a direct sequel named Red Rackham's Treasure which follows directly from the events of this one, but the movie never goes there. The trouble is, had they have just combined the two comics, the movie would have felt a lot more rounded and would have introduced the necessary characters, thus making a really good origin story. My concern is that they'll attempt a hybrid of Red Rackham's and something else. Frankly, i'd rather them just devote something like 7 Crystal Balls/Prisoners of the Sun so fill the entire plot as a follow up, but this can't really happen because Calculus needs to be introduced.

One other gripe which has been covered, the action. Mostly really good and reflecting the style of Herge, but the bigger and louder it got, the more tiring it got. I mean this literally too because I found myself getting drowsy in my seat as compared to the hand to hand combat which had my undivided attention. I especially refer to the fight scene with the crane at the end, this is where they could have just moved onto the Red Rackham part of the story. I also felt there was far too much time spent on Haddock's alcoholic fueled antics. The humour grew very fast to be quite tired and repetitive. There is so much more to this character.

Other than that, it's a keeper. I'l definitely own a copy of this upon the home release for blu-ray. For now, Tintin is in quite good hands. All I ask is that they take a "less is more" approach next time for the spectacle and action. More story, less explosions and much more character development.

3.5 out of 5
(GOOD)
 
Short and sweet here..

I'm not a reader of Tintin, so I went in with absolutely zero preconceived notions... My brother (with a degree in French), however, is a HUGE Tintinophile and has all the albums in French (along with all the Asterix albums as well). So if there was ever an uberfan, it's him.

We saw this Christmas night and while I found it very enjoyable, he loved it... He felt it was close enough to the spirit of the source material that it could be forgiven for any artistic license that took place. The Characters were true in form and the action was well played out.

Overall, he was very happy with the outcome.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top