Nah, there are plenty of posts by people who didn't like it. Some even in threads about the episode and the burn it's self.anyone else?
General season 3 was ok but the burn was never the prority and wasnt't really addressed until later in the series.
I was hoping for an Omega partical cause for that disruption
or is it just me
I fell into "Burn"-ham thinking but as you say, I like that it wasn't something predictable like that.I like that they came up with something I couldn't guess.
That's actually why I like it. Subvert expectations.but rather that the cause was underwhelming relative to how they built it up in the story. The
Also thisI like that we got something that feels like it was right out of a TOS of TNG episode with its weirdness.
That's actually why I like it. Subvert expectations.
Also this
Same.That's actually why I like it. Subvert expectations.
Omega Particle is so obscurely fanwankish that I can’t even imagine how unsatisfying an outcome that would have been.
I like that we got something that feels like it was right out of a TOS of TNG episode with its weirdness. Was it odd? Yes. But at least it wasn’t some half-assed callback to something most fans wouldn’t remember or care about.
I was also disappointed with the cause of the burn but not so much by the cause itself but rather that the cause was underwhelming relative to how they built it up in the story. The marketing people basically hyped up the mystery box to try and sell the season and they stretched it out over the entire season and in doing so made expectations high where I was expecting some earth shattering revelation. So when you find out that it's just some guy who cried it seems like a letdown, even though the story itself was rather interesting. The weird thing was that stretching it out over the season was unnecessary from a story telling standpoint because it had minimal connection with any of the other ongoing plots. I think it would have been received better if they didn't hype it up so much and also resolved it sooner.
In a way though it was a much needed adjustment to the equally ridiculous super high stakes of previous seasons where all life in the galaxy hangs in the balance, but it was an overcorrection. They went too far in the other direction.
That's the Trek writers for you... they somehow manage to mess up the basic terminology and have this unsatiable urge to over-exaggerate (for example: saying the AI will destroy life in the entire universe vs just say the Milky Way galaxy... or how the Burn was galaxy-wide, but then some characters refer to 'most of known space' which could easily mean 'just the Federation', or the Milky Way and nearby galaxies - that is IF the Federation went extragalactic... but it seems like it hadn't, which is even stupider.).
Thats how real people talk though. The world/galaxy/universe is "local'.That's the Trek writers for you... they somehow manage to mess up the basic terminology and have this unsatiable urge to over-exaggerate (for example: saying the AI will destroy life in the entire universe vs just say the Milky Way galaxy... or how the Burn was galaxy-wide, but then some characters refer to 'most of known space' which could easily mean 'just the Federation', or the Milky Way and nearby galaxies - that is IF the Federation went extragalactic... but it seems like it hadn't, which is even stupider.).
Also, the tendency to exaggerate has been a part of human storytelling for thousands of years.Thats how real people talk though. The world/galaxy/universe is "local'.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.