The really interesting thing is that it's going to be a Second Doctor novel; the first one to feature an Original Series Doctor since the series came back.
Like Moorcock, Baxter has incredible range -- he can do cosmic stuff, space opera stuff, near-present stuff, historical stuff, even outright fantasy. He capable of any of the major Who genres, so that's a plus.
Baxter can be utterly depressing to read, though. His writing lacks spark on occasion, and at times he seems very pessimistic about humanity. (Read Titan sometime. You'll lose your will to live.)
So on the one hand, I'm excited by Baxter because of his prominence in the genre. But on the other hand, I'm a little cautious of a book that Doctor Who Magazine will likely castigate because it's completely unlike Last of the Gaderne, too.
Titan's a great novel, though probably not for the downspiritedBaxter can be utterly depressing to read, though. His writing lacks spark on occasion, and at times he seems very pessimistic about humanity. (Read Titan sometime. You'll lose your will to live.)
The instant that I saw that this thread was in the Doctor Who forum, I thought of The Time Ships. Apparently it was going to be a Doctor Who novel but kind of grew beyond that. It's a rollicking good read overall, as is The Light Of Other Days with its killer concept.That said, I am oftened disappointed by Baxter, as he has no idea how to end things. The first two Manifold books, The Light of Other Days, and The Time Ships all start great and then have cop-out endings.
I still need to pick up the Moorcock book.
(Big Finish has since revived the Short Trips stories, but they've got around the licence issue by doing them as audio releases rather than print).
I still need to pick up the Moorcock book.
Good luck. I ordered that from Chapters on-line nearly a month ago (its release date is listed as November 9 on the Chapters website). I'm still waiting for it.
Aside from the seven published in 2005.![]()
I have to correct one point: Big Finish did not "get around the licence issue" by doing Short Trips as audio releases; they have to have a licence to produce anything Doctor Who-related, and indeed that's exactly what happened: when they lost the licence to do Short Trips books, they successfully negotiated a licence to do them on audio. Just a different licence, that's all.
Back to the original point, has anyone seen any other source to support the Baxter claim? His website says nothing and this thread appears to be the only source for this information.
GallifreyBase has a thread about it, unless you think the people in that are also liars for some reason.
I seem to recall you kept on questioning everyone as to whether the Moorcock novel was really going to happen, too.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.