• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starship versus Star Ship

ChallengerHK

Captain
Captain
The term “starship” has been a thorn in the side of treknologists. Primarily this comes down to two causes: the Enterprise’s dedication plaque and the chart on Commodore Stone’s wall in “Court Martial.”

What I noticed a while back was the difference in spelling. The dedicated plaque reads “Starship Class”, one word. The wall chart reads “Star Ship Status”, two words.

This might point to something, but it also might mean nothing. I tend to think that there is a meaning there, although it’s still largely as murky as it was before. My experience working with the military is that nothing like the spelling of a word is done willy nilly, nor is it left to chance. I think it’s likely that “starship” and “star ship” are two different things.

So I started poking around to see if any kind of meaning might fall out of a hole. This hasn’t been an extensive search; I don’t have the time. But I did find a couple of interesting data points.

In another thread I mysteriously asked for people to look in a couple of scripts for me for the spelling of the term(s) in dialog. I don’t view this as conclusive evidence. The teleplay writers are clearly extra-diegetic, and probably ill-inclined to spend time concerned about the term’s spelling. That said, in both Commodore Stone’s speech:

Look, Jim. Not one man in a million can do what you and I did... command a starship.
A hundred decisions a day, hundreds of lives staked on your making every one of them right...”

and in the description of the fleet in “The Ultimate Computer”:

“EXT. SPACE – FOUR STARSHIPS (MOVING R. TO L.)”

the one word spelling is used. There’s not a lot to be gleaned from this, except that, if the terms do represent different things, they are related to the sense of the word as it is used on the dedication plaque.

(Thanks to @alchemist and @Maurice for the references.)

The other data point came to me very much by accident. I was researching something else and noticed that the Franklin’s dedication plaque is also one word, like the Enterprise.

II think we can glean a little bit more from this data point, although much of it is still conjecture.

1) “Starship” may represent different things at different times. The Franklin is still Prime Universe, so the terminology is canonical (at least until the next iteration of Trek comes along), but it could represent subtly or grossly different things based on the different time frame, or on the fact that the Franklin was pre-Federation.

2) If the Starbase 11 chart is any indication, the term is being used in an entirely different way by Stone. I started a thread a while back about that chart, and there were several folks who claimed that they could read all of the numbers clearly; what I found funny is that some of them still disagreed on the numbers represented. All that said, one of the numbers seems to be either 1864 or 1664. If it’s the former, that would answer one huge question, i.e., “Do all of the numbers on the chart represent what we in shorthand call the Constitution Class?” The fact that the term is two words on the chart and one word on the plaque also lends credence to this idea.

3) In at least one way having two terms, which each have no provable definition, muddies the waters even farther. We now have two mysterious things called “Starship/Star Ship.”

Very interested in hearing people’s reactions, especially @Timo and @MAGolding, whose analyses are always on point.
 
Then too, there is the concept of the Ship Star...

...Isn't the Enterprise always one of those?

Scripts may have spellings, but in the actual Star Trek universe, only one instance of the two-word spelling gets air time. "STAR SHIP STATUS" thus could be analyzed as an entirely isolated phenomenon, while "starship" is mere shorthand for "Starfleet ship" (and is available in thousands in the TOS era, hence 1/1000,000 times the billions of humans gives us the exact right number of skippers).

On the chart, three parameters are given, and two are diverse: the number and the % completed bar. The first, the NCC prefix, is uniform. So why is it included at all? Could it be a NAR or NSP, a non-starship, sometimes makes it to this exalted list, too? I'm still partial to the idea that this is a competition: vessels on the list are gathering points that improve their star ship status, and when they reach 100%, like the second one from top, they can start working towards the next level. It's all in that one bar, though: you approach completion as measured on a single parameter. This makes it unlikely for the parameter to reflect anything Stone's dockyards are doing to the ships, since how to compare a ship that still lacks 99% of its napkin dispensers against one that lacks but the last two segments of the main plasma conduit?

The single parameter isn't something the engineers dreamed up, IMHO. It's the doing of other sorts of minds. A tactician wouldn't think in such terms, either: a ship with a broken shield generator and a ship with two jammed main phasers would be very different beasts in battle, even if both getting a "87% complete" on that bar. So it's attractive to think that it's the HR or PR department at work there, giving "star ship" brownie points to ships (that is, crews!) that perform particularly heroically.

Stone's cold and logical decisions on the scheduling of repairs are one thing. When staring thoughtfully at that chart, he may well be thinking of Jim Kirk instead: of his status and stature, of his reputation and its significance to the service. Should he bring to justice the starship captain whose Star Ship Status is among the highest, almost on par with the skipper of NCC-1831?

However, the chart doesn't gracefully yield to even that sort of interpretation. If star ship status is the defining parameter, why are the ships listed in random order? Why not with the highest status on top or bottom? The NCCs are uniform, the numbers random, the "% complete" random. So what is not random there? Is it an unseen parameter, and if so, why make a chart that fails to show a parameter? Perhaps it's rather that the parameter is very much there and staring at us: the ships are listed in the very order of their Star Ship Status, and the "% complete" has nothing to do with that status, just like the registry number has nothing to do with it.

I guess we should just be thankful that "star ship" only ever appears here, it being "starship" everywhere else, and this anomaly can be left as a mystery...

Timo Saloniemi
 
Last edited:
Perhaps inserting random pauses between words isn't just a tic of Kirk's, but something a sizeable proportion of 23rd Century humanity suffers from? ;)
 
One way to extend the chart would be in order of arrival from top to bottom, and the completion percentage would always be relative to requirements, whatever they may be for a certainly-not-spaceship. Commodore Stone likes to see those progress bars move to the right in successive printouts until the vessels eventually disappear from the list: the details are up to each maintenance section.
 
It's been blown out the window by ENT and DIS, but I liked to think (back in the day) that during TOS, "starship" referred to a specific type of Starfleet vessel, separate from cruisers, scouts, etc. By the time of TNG, though, I had rationalized the term had become far more generic within the fleet. These days, however, I guess it doesn't matter...
:shrug:
 
I just treat the term "StarShip" as a classification for any space faring vessel with FTL capability.

The capability to travel between Star Systems at reasonably fast velocities that won't consume a giant % chunk of your life time just to get to the destination.
 
I just treat the term "StarShip" as a classification for any space faring vessel with FTL capability.

That was my head canon as well, but I have to admit that it's just an assumption.

One way to extend the chart would be in order of arrival from top to bottom

That was my thought as well. I'd guess that there are probably several ways to organize that chart that would make sense. The problem is there's no evidence to support any of them over any other.

I guess we should just be thankful that "star ship" only ever appears here, it being "starship" everywhere else, and this anomaly can be left as a mystery...

I think there's little doubt that it will be a mystery for a while. I was hoping that someone would identify other uses of the two word spelling.
 
Modern Trek has retconned the size and look of the USS Enterprise NCC-1701 and all of TOS. I'm not sure the terminology of "Starship" matters any more than "time warp factor" or "Vulcanians" did after "The Cage"
 
I wish those were treated more as flavor of the day, to be preserved forever so the reader or viewer is transported immediately into the beginnings, rather than continue the usual practice of pretending like it never happened regardless of era. For instance, the time-warp drive would’ve been the version that, you know, broke the time barrier, allowing Starfleet ships to… Anyway, the manual would make sure to point out the difference between traveling at warp and time warp. Of course, all that would’ve been forgotten as the time-warp drive became more common, and later innovations (barring transwarp) would tend not to arrive with too much special terminology.

Similarly, ‘Vulcanian’ might have been the result of someone’s attempt to distinguish between Vulcan the hypothetical planet and the real planet Vulcan by calling the latter ‘Vulcania’. A few people might’ve tried to use those terms but ultimately the economy of language would’ve decided otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Blurry picture of our discussion:
courtmartialhd011.png
 
I wish those were treated more as flavor of the day, to be preserved forever so the reader or viewer is transported immediately into the beginnings, rather than continue the usual practice of pretending like it never happened regardless of era. For instance, the time-warp drive would’ve been the version that, you know, broke the time barrier, allowing Starfleet ships to… Anyway, the manual would make sure to point out the difference between traveling at warp and time warp. Of course, all that would’ve been forgotten as the time-warp drive became more common, and later innovations (barring transwarp) would tend not to arrive with too much special terminology.

Similarly, ‘Vulcanian’ might have been the result of someone’s attempt to distinguish between Vulcan the hypothetical planet and the real planet Vulcan by calling the latter ‘Vulcania’. A few people might’ve tried to use those terms but ultimately the economy of language would’ve decided otherwise.

We could say that it wasn't the language that evolved, but the universe: planet Vulcan ceased to be the capital of the mighty interstellar dominion of Vulcania (even though old-fashioned or insensitive people might not wish to acknowledge that), planet Andor likewise no longer rules over Andoria, and yes, warp engine tech might have evolved, too.

Then again, we get fun relapses and alternate takes quite regardless of the procession of pseudohistory: transporting may be very briefly referred to as teleporting (even in the middle of a given adventure that otherwise uses the other terminology), dilithium crystals as lithium crystals, phasers may be phaser guns for a while and then no longer, and there's always a prior point of evidence to establish this as true back-and-forth rather than monotonic evolution from one version to another.

I guess I'm happy with having both, since there's realism to both: people today may speak of lifts or elevators or even both, and there really once was a time when the tech didn't exist under either name. But as Trek jumps back and forth between fictional eras, it always feels nice to meet familiar era-specific turns of phrase.

It's just that "starship" is a pretty central piece of Trek vocabulary, and we only ever get that single use of the two-word version. Sure, we got that with "teleport" in DSC, too, but there we could see it was the same old transporting being called by a funny name. "Star ship status" is more vulnerable to speculation...

Timo Saloniemi
 
ChallengerHK's post has made me think about the possibility that in the era of TOS there are several different words for what 20th century science fiction fans call starships.

Perhaps every FTL intersellar manned vehicle is a member of a type of ship called, something like a star travelling spaceship, for example, and those are callled plain spaceships in TOS for the 20th century audience.

And perhaps all or most of Starfleet's intersellar faster than light ships are sometimes called starships in TOS..

And perhaps the top of the line specicl exploration ships of the Starfleet are callled star ships because they are the glamorous "stars" of the fleet that every Starfleet officer dreams of someday commanding..

Thus it seems possible that there might be two or more different spellings of starship in the era of TOS, to distinguish between the two or more differnt meanings of the word in the era of TOS..

I note that the word starship or star ship might be seen onsreen in the dedication plaque of the Enterprise, in the report on Talos IV glimpsed in "The Menagerie Part 1" and in the plans of a constitution class phaser array Khan reads in "Space Seed", as well as in the chart in "Court Martial".

Here are some examples of the word starship from transcripts. And of course the transcripts might not spell the word the same way as original scripts did, so people who have access to copies or the originals of the scripts could check the scripts for the spelling used.

The Menagerie Part 1:

MCCOY: What's his problem, Commodore?
MENDEZ: Inspection tour of a cadet vessel. Old Class J starship. One of the baffle plates ruptured.
MCCOY: The delta rays?

Court Martial:

COMPUTER: Ship nomenclature. Specify.
KIRK: United Starship Republic, number 1371.

STONE: Stop recording. Now, look, Jim. Not one man in a million could do what you and I have done. Command a starship. A hundred decisions a day, hundreds of lives staked on you making every one of them right. You're played out, Jim. Exhausted.

COMPUTER: James T. Kirk, serial number SC937-0176CEC. Service rank, Captain. Position, Starship command. Current assignment, USS Enterprise. Commendations, Palm Leaf Of Axanar Peace Mission, Grankite Order of Tactics, Class of Excellence, Prantares Ribbon of Commendation, Classes first and second

Amok Time:

KIRK: No, it's not. I know the Altair situation. We would be one of three starships. Very impressive, very diplomatic, but it's simply not that vital.

The Doomsday Machine:

SPOCK: I have it on the sensors, Captain. By configuration, a starship stopped in space. She appears to be drifting.

KIRK: Spock, listen. Maybe Matt Decker didn't die for nothing. He had the right idea but not enough power to do it. Am I correct in assuming that a fusion explosion of ninety seven megatons will result if a starship impulse engine is overloaded?

The Ultimate Computer:

KIRK: Twenty? I can't run a starship with twenty crew.

CHEKOV: Captain, the M-5 unit has already identified the vessels as Federation starships Excalibur and Lexington.

UHURA: Sir, sensors are picking up four Federation starships. M-5 is altering course to intercept.

KIRK: There's your murder charge. Deliberate. Calculated. It's killing men and women. Four starships, sixteen hundred men and women!

DAYSTROM: Stop. M-5, your attack on the starships is wrong. You must break it off.

DAYSTROM: But these are not enemy vessels. These are Federation starships. You're killing, We are killing, murdering human beings, beings of our own kind. You were not created for that purpose. You are my greatest creation. The unit to save men. You must not destroy men.

DAYSTROM: Destroyed, Kirk? No. We're invincible. Look what we've done. Your mighty starships, Four toys to be crushed as we choose.

KIRK: But you have murdered. Scan the starship Excalibur, which you destroyed. Is there life aboard?

And there are many other examples which can be found, and the spelling checked in copies of the original scripts.

In normal science fiction use the word starship means space vehicle cpable for carrying a manned crew over interstellar distances. In space opera type science fiction where there is FTL interstellar travel the term starship is usually reserved for FTL interstellar ships since few people would be willing to travel interstellar distances in STL ships if FTL was available.

In all of TOS there are only two manned STL interstellar vehicles, the Botany Bay in "Space Seed' and Yonada in "For the World is Hollow and I have Touched the Sky", and I don't remember eithr being called a starship.

There are some interstellar FTL ships in TOS which seeem to be privately owned.

In "Mudd's Women" the Enterprise chases a mysterious ship which manages to avoid being caught for some time and thus should have approximately equal speed.

SPOCK: Sensor reading on the vessel. I make it out as a small class J cargo ship, and his engines are super-heating.

MUDD: Ah, sure, these starships are really something marvellous, but men will always be men no matter where they are. Eh, mister? You'll never take that out of them.

So a starship is very impressive compared to a class J. Cargo ahip and other ships that Mudd & Co. were familiar with.

Mudd's offenses include:

COMPUTER: Offense record. ... Purchase of space vessel with counterfeit currency. ...

So there ar privately owned interstellar ships in TOS.

In "Metamorphosis" Zefrem Cochrane apparently had a one man FTL spaceship 150 years earlier.

In "The Trouble with Tribbles" Cyrano Jones apparently had a one man FTL ship.:

BARIS: The man is an independent scout, Captain. It is quite possible he is also a Klingon spy.
SPOCK: We have already checked on the background of Mister Cyrano Jones. He is a licensed asteroid locator and prospector. He's never broken the law, at least not severely. For the past seven years, with his one-man spaceship, he's obtained a marginal living by engaging in the buying and selling of rare merchandise, including, unfortunately, tribbles.

In "Friday's Child" the top speed of a freighter is mentioned:

SULU: At best, a freighter might travel warp two.
SCOTT: I'm well aware of a freighter's maximum speed, Mister Sulu.

So freighters can reach FTL warp speeds.

In "Bread and Circuses" they find the remains of the SS Beagle:

SPOCK: No doubt about it, Captain. The space debris comes from the survey vessel SS Beagle.

SPOCK: SS Beagle. Small class four stardrive vessel. Crew of forty seven, commanded by. Jim, I believe you knew him. Captain R M Merik.
KIRK: Yes, at the academy. He was dropped in his fifth year. He went into the merchant service.

So the survey ship SS Beagle was apaprenlty a commercial or research survey vessel.

KIRK: I've had to select men to die before so that others could be saved.
CLAUDIUS: You're a clever liar, Captain Kirk. Merikus was a spaceship captain. I've observed him thoroughly. Your species has no such strength.
MERIK: He commands not just a spaceship, Proconsul, but a starship. A very special vessel and crew. I tried for such a command.

So there is a clear difference between a civilian interstellar ship, which would be called a starship in most science fiction stories, and a starship in the Federation Starfleet in TOS.

is there a difference between lesser Starfleet vessels and Starfleet Starships in TOS? The answer to that is less clear.

The Antares in "Charlie X "is described several ways:

Captain's Log, star date 1533.6. Now manoeuvring to come alongside cargo vessel Antares. Its Captain and First officer are beaming over to us with an unusual passenger.

KIRK: This must be a space first. A transport ship that doesn't need anything?

Captain's Log, star date 1535.8. UESPA headquarters notified of the mysterious loss of science probe vessel Antares.

SPOCK: Your mind is not on the game, Captain. Check. The Antares?
KIRK: A survey ship with twenty men aboard lost. No reason. Obviously, Captain Ramart was not aware of any trouble. I can't figure it.

So apparently the Antares was a type of ship which was used for several different purposes. Possibly ships of that class were used for several different purposes at the same time, like starships but on a much smaller scale.

The officers of the Antares wear uniforms like that of the second pilot "Where No Man Has Gone Before", and so should be more or less Starfleet officers. Since UESPA or the United Earth Space Probe Agency is notified of the destruction of the Antares, it was probably a ship of the UESPA fleet.

So if the Antares was a Starfleet and/or UESPA ship, it seems very differnt from Starfleet Starships.

The Antares had a crew of 20, but when Charlie came aboard the Enterprise:

CHARLIE: How many humans like me on this ship?
RAMART: Like a whole city in space, Charlie. Over four hundred in the crew of a starship, aren't there, Captain?
KIRK: Four hundred and twenty eight, to be exact. Is there anything we can do for you, Captain? Medical supplies, provisions?

So if the Antares was a Starfeet ship it was a lot smaller than what captain Ramart considered to be a starship.

So it is possible that in TOS there is a word starship used by Federation civilians for any interstellar FTL ship, even one man ships, because such ships travel between stars, while Starfleett restricts the word starship to special Starfleet ships which might be called starships not because they travel between stars, but because they are the "stars" of the Starfleet.

And possibly there are at least two written forms, star ship and starship, and possibly others, to distinquish the different types of vessels which would be lumped together as starships in most 20th century science fiction.
 
Last edited:
Regardless, whether starship or star ship (seen only once on the chart as star ship), all references to "starships" in TOS are either not shown or look like the Enterprise. Never has any other vessel serving in UESPA/Starfleet/Federation been called a starship and shown to be something other than an Enterprise clone. As for "cadet vessel, Old Class J starship", perhaps that Class J starship design is the predecessor to the current Class K starship design that looks like the Enterprise. A battleship is a battleship, but not all battleships are created equal from one era to another or even within their own era. That's my feeling about starships.

By the way, in the Cage and Menagerie, Pike referred to the USS Enterprise as the "United Space Ship Enterprise". Apparently, 13 years before TOS, the starship debate was not an issue...<ducks under desk>
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top