Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.
You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?

Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.
You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.![]()
This seems to be all i've heard about SGU. The priority of the promotion i've seen seems to have been 1) HOT LESBIANS 2) Oh yeah there's also gates and ships and other Stargate stuff in the show too.
No offense.
Or Dumbledore.You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.![]()
^Define "handled well." Frankly, romance has always been an afterthought at best in this franchise. I was never particularly fond of the whole Jack O'Neill/Samantha Carter mess. The Daniel/Vala thing was hit & miss. The writers flirted with the idea of pairing Sheppard up with either Weir or Teyla but never went through with either. Frankly, their best romance, IMO, was McKay/Keller, and even that strained believability. (Why would such a sweet woman, or ANY woman for that matter, put up with this asshole?) If the lesbianism here is handled poorly, that will be par for the course.
^Yeah but that was also an extension/exacerbation of the whole O'Neill/Carter mess.
You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.![]()
Or Dumbledore.
Since it's a given the romance angle will be a flop, they might as well just go whole hog for the "scoring points for being daring" motivation, which would require them to have gay male characters because they don't get points for lesbians and in fact I think they should get points subtracted.^Define "handled well." Frankly, romance has always been an afterthought at best in this franchise. I was never particularly fond of the whole Jack O'Neill/Samantha Carter mess. The Daniel/Vala thing was hit & miss. The writers flirted with the idea of pairing Sheppard up with either Weir or Teyla but never went through with either. Frankly, their best romance, IMO, was McKay/Keller, and even that strained believability. (Why would such a sweet woman, or ANY woman for that matter, put up with this asshole?) If the lesbianism here is handled poorly, that will be par for the course.
You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.![]()
Or Dumbledore.
You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?![]()
Or Dumbledore.
I'm pretty sure that Rowling never thought much about Dumbledore's sexuality, and just decided to retcon it in as a stab at all the Christian fundies who'd been railing against her over the years.
Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.
You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?![]()
Wow, the worst way to handle gay characters is to wait till they're dead to out them. If you're going to be that cowardly, just don't do it at all.
You mean like Cain on Battlestar Galactica?![]()
Uh, no, apples and oranges there. Cain's sexuality was revealed at the beginning of the flashback episode Razor. So, yes, she was already dead but her story was just beginning.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.