Considering the Martains were using an Antimatter Fuel Pod from 65 million years in the Future...no. I wouldn't say that.But ultimately, the easier/safer choice right?
Considering the Martains were using an Antimatter Fuel Pod from 65 million years in the Future...no. I wouldn't say that.But ultimately, the easier/safer choice right?
In screen yes the explosion appears small, but in dialog:There was always some inconsistency here, as far back as TOS. In "Whom Gods Destroy," Garth claims to have discovered some super-colossal doomsday explosive that dwarfs anything possessed by the Federation -- but which, onscreen, doesn't seem more potent than a stick of dynamite. (He blows up a dancing girl, not a planet.) Is that really more impressive than what we've been told the Enterprise is capable of?
Although I suppose we can rationalize that Garth was simply off his head and delusional.
And there's always been similar exaggeration in Star Trek. Characters constantly claiming that a matter antimatter reactor breach looks like an exploding Sun; and could wipe out a star system, it every time we see a ship explode even with a warp core breach the explosion is exceedingly small and quick on screen.SULU: There's been an explosion on Elba Two!
SCOTT: Point nine five!
MCCOY: It must've wiped out everything.
SCOTT: Immediate probe. Is the force field in place, Mister Sulu?
SULU: Yes, sir. Solidly.
UHURA: (at Spock's station) Life continues to exist on the planet.

And there's always been similar exaggeration in Star Trek. Characters constantly claiming that a matter antimatter reactor breach looks like an exploding Sun; and could wipe out a star system, it every time we see a ship explode even with a warp core breach the explosion is exceedingly small and quick on screen.
The graphics department had a little TOO much fun making this one.
Yes.Isn't Pluto classed as a "dwarf planet"? So...still technically a planet?![]()
In so far as a vice president is a president.Isn't Pluto classed as a "dwarf planet"? So...still technically a planet?![]()
Pluto for President!In so far as a vice president is a president.
Pluto was listed as a planet in TOS.![]()
Pluto seems to be a planet in the Trekverse. Or else there is a different Planet X 65 million years ago...

)Pluto was listed as a planet in TOS.
(Neither TOS or SNW take place in the 20th/21st century so what does it matter how scientists classified Puto in the 20th/21st century?)
Because Star Trek is a rigorous scientific pursuit that inspired people to join the sciences and become explorers and it must be exacting in its nomenclature!Pluto was listed as a planet in TOS.
(Neither TOS or SNW take place in the 20th/21st century so what does it matter how scientists classified Puto in the 20th/21st century?)

I think it's done with levers.Because Star Trek is a rigorous scientific pursuit that inspired people to join the sciences and become explorers and it must be exacting in its nomenclature!
Otherwise, how else will the transporter work?
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.