• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Ahoy. The Reviews are coming in.

DimesDan

No longer living the Irish dream.
Premium Member
First up, the Guardian:

Nearly 50 years after Doctor Who first appeared on BBC1, the Doctor's capacity for regeneration has known no bounds.

But it really will be the end of the line for one of the time travelling drama's lead characters when it returns for a new series later this month.

The question is, which one?

The programme's show runner Steven Moffat risked the ire of fans with a "spoiler" giving away that one of four characters – the Doctor, played by Matt Smith, his companion Amy Pond (Karen Gillan), her husband Rory Williams (Arthur Davill) or mysterious fellow time traveller River Song, played by former ER star Alex Kingston – will meet their doom.

"We're not lying, we're not cheating. One of those four people is going to die," Moffat told the new issue of Doctor Who magazine.

"The Doctor's darkest hour is coming. Shows like Doctor Who should have big colourful, memorable moments that make you go, 'What the hell?' Well, this is one of them.
"It's hard to create shock in Doctor Who when we've already blown up the universe a couple of times. What do you do next?"

Moffat said the first two episodes of the new series – which feature a mystery alien species known as the Silents – is the scariest opener to any Doctor Who series yet.
"You put the jokes in for the adults, and you make it scary to appeal to children. They absolutely rank the best Doctor Who episodes in order of frighteningness."

The opening two-parter, without giving too much away, is set in 1960s America and features the moon landings, Richard Nixon in the White House ("Say hi to David Frost," the Doctor tells him), Area 51 and an alien race with a unique USP.

Fans could be forgiven for assuming neither the Doctor nor his companion will die, however, with both Smith and Gillan signed up for the duration of the new series. Possibly they travelled back in time and changed their mind.

The cliffhanger is guaranteed to generate plenty of expectation around Doctor Who's return to BBC1 on Easter Saturday, 23 April. It is the sixth series since the Saturday teatime favourite returned in 2005 after a 16-year absence.
Moffat, one of the creative powerhouses behind BBC1's acclaimed re-imagining of Sherlock Holmes, has promised to double the number of "event episodes" in the new run, the second with Smith in the title role.

"You are going to get several cliffhangers and a couple of real belters," said Moffat. "If you run for 13 weeks [viewers] can start to feel like you can miss one and it would be okay. We want to stop that feeling."

While there were plenty of plaudits for Smith —– who at 26 was the youngest actor to be given the role since it began in 1963 – there was a mixed reception for last year's series, the first overseen by Moffat, with ratings down year on year.

The new series will feature guest appearances from Downton Abbey star Hugh Bonneville, David Walliams, James Corden, Lily Cole, and the voice of Michael Sheen, as well as the return of one of the doctor's most enduring foes, the Cybermen.

It will be split into two, with seven episodes running until June before it returns with another six episodes in the autumn.

But quizzed by a young viewer whether it would also see the return of the daleks, Moffat remained tight-lipped. "They might or they might not," he said.

"That's the excitement. I'm not telling you."

BBC1 controller Danny Cohen, speaking at the series launch, described Doctor Who as "unique and brilliant … world class science fiction and a testament to the stars and the people who make it".

Moffat ended by appealing to the media not to give too much away about the impending "death". "Tease them but don't tell them," he said.

It remains to be seen whether they can remain tight-lipped. If not then the Doctor may be after them with his sonic screwdriver. Assuming he's still alive, of course.

I must admit, what with the trailers last week and now the press launch of series 6.1 I really can not wait till Easter Saturday!
 
Moffat ended by appealing to the media not to give too much away about the impending "death". "Tease them but don't tell them," he said.

Which is ironic as the BBC's own syopsis of the episode pretty much gives the game away!
 
Moffat ended by appealing to the media not to give too much away about the impending "death". "Tease them but don't tell them," he said.

Which is ironic as the BBC's own syopsis of the episode pretty much gives the game away!

May I just say, that I do not work for the Guardian and nor was I at the press launch last night, I just quoted the original review.
 
Isn't Matt locked up until the end of 2012? I had thought I had read an article about a three year deal. Maybe not.
 
When Smith was on Craig Ferguson's show last summer, he was very cagey about whether or not he was staying, which led several people I know (including myself) at the office to all conclude that Smith was gone at the end of this year.

According to some reports from the press screening last night, Smith says he still has a ways to go and he's already talking with Moffat about the 50th-anniversary plans. Assuming he's not blowing smoke to put people off the scent, it sounds like Smith intends to be in the role until at least 2013.
 
Oh and here's what the greatest Sci Fi and Fantasy magazines (website) has to say about the opening two episodes:

The opening two-parter for series six of new Doctor Who was unveiled last night at London’s Olympia last night, in a screening room above the Doctor Who Experience. Matt Smith, Karen Gillan, Arthur Darvill, Alex Kingston and Steven Moffat were in the audience, along with the episode’s main guest star, Mark Sheppard, a whole host of series six writers (Gareth Roberts, Toby Whithouse, Matthew Graham, Mark Gatiss) and even impersonator (and famous Who fan) Jon Culshaw (who desperately had his hand in the air all the way through the post-screening question and answer session). So what did we think? Well, as has become our tradition now, we’re not going to give you our definitive review – or any spoilers – just yet, but here are some initial thoughts and teasery titbits, in no particular order (other than the order we think of them in):
  1. Neither episode starts as you’d expect
  2. Both episodes open magnificently, especially episode two which is a patented Moffat-montage special
  3. The gay agenda is back!
  4. The monsters (whose mere name would be a spoiler) are brilliant, with a truly chilling MO. They should rate up there with the Weeping Angels as one of the new series’ greatest creations. They look great, but it’s the idea behind them that is truly chilling
  5. There is an Easter Island gag
  6. The Doctor dances… with some unexpected film stars
  7. There are lots of Americans with guns gags
  8. There are two fez mentions
  9. It’s very, very dark and spooky at times. Wait till you see the scene in the Whitehouse toilets…
  10. At least three Moffat tropes are put into action again
  11. There is the startling return of a familiar special effect… twice
  12. There is the curious return of a familiar prop
  13. The Utah footage is quite simply stunning, but there’s not as much of it as we’d expected
  14. There are some quite beautiful, cinematic sequences
  15. Rory gets to wear some specs
  16. Amy reveals a secret
  17. The President’s nose dominates any scene it’s in
  18. The special effects are downright magnificent
  19. Matt Smith takes his portrayal of the Doctor up a gear
  20. The Doctor looks very embarrassed at one point
  21. The first time we see the Doctor, he’s naked. Sort of…
  22. The monsters have some important dialogue, so it’s a bit of a shame their voices are not terribly clear at times
  23. The first episode is a little talky and surprisingly character-led when you’d expect a barnstorming opening; the second episode kicks off storming that barn and keeps storming it
  24. Having said that, the character led-moments are often quite exquisite
  25. It’s funny, it’s wildly inventive, it’s fiendishly clever, it’s surprising, it’s audacious, it’s uncompromising and it’s quite unlike anything else on television
  26. There’s lots of timey whimey stuff, and not just in terms of the science fiction – more so, we’re referring to some of the storytelling techniques involved, with lots of flashbacks, sudden jumps and montages
  27. However, it’s so packed with ideas, you can’t help thinking some important elements are undeveloped. There are enough great concepts here to fuel five or six episodes, which is a good thing in many ways, because it keeps the energy fizzing and the plot surprising, but they do all fight for room a bit. We’d certainly liked to have seen more about the monsters’ background and had the dénouement clarified, among other things
  28. You can’t help thinking there are a lot of moments when kids are going to turn to mum and dad go, “Why did that happen?” and mum or dad will go, “Erm… shhhh, I’m concentrating!”
  29. You may suffer from revelation fatigue by the end of it. And a lot of things – perhaps a couple too many – are not wrapped up in the story itself, but are ongoing mysteries to be sorted out later. This show is getting like Lost, designed to be picked over on the internet! Let’s hope it doesn’t take seven years to get some answers
  30. The final, final, final scene, though, will ensure you’ll carry on tuning in to find out what happens next… or maybe in the story after next. Or maybe next season
 
It's be great if Smith is still around in 2013. I realise he won't want to do the role forever, and frankly much as I love him in the role, I wouldn't want him to. I think a change of Doctor every 3 or 4 years is probably for the best, stops an actor getting too comfortable/typecast in a role and it helps keep the show fresh. It'd be great if Smith made it to the 50th anniversary though, and what a great jumping off point that'd be for Doctor #12!
 
And here's what BBC News has to say on the subject:

Doctor Who boss says season start is 'darkest yet'

Doctor Who boss Steven Moffat has said the new season of the sci-fi show kicks off in a darker style than usual.
Launching the first two episodes at London's Olympia, Moffat pleaded with journalists to keep the show's secrets under wraps.

The opener sees Matt Smith's Doctor reunited with Karen Gillan's Amy Pond, Arthur Darvill's Rory and Alex Kingston's River Song in 1960s America.

The quartet team up with President Nixon to fight a new alien threat.

The aliens - partly inspired by Edvard Munch's The Scream - are introduced in the two opening episodes, The Impossible Astronaut and Day of the Moon.

The programmes, which feature scenes shot in the Utah desert last year, will be shown on BBC One later this month.

"To be honest, it's darker than any other opener of a season," said Moffat, who wrote both episodes.

"We've been pretty dark before in Doctor Who. But we're coming in from the dark side just because we haven't done it that way before."

Yet Moffat, who took over as lead writer and executive producer, said he did not think the shows were too scary for children.

"First of all, you make Doctor Who frightening to appeal to children. It's the children who find it frightening, not the adults.

"Children absolutely rank Doctor Who stories in order of frightening-ness - that's what it's about.

"You put the jokes in and the silly bits in for the adults and you put the scares in for the kids. I've got two kids of my own and I'd never do anything I didn't think was acceptable for them.

"Having said that, one of them does tend to sleep on our bedroom floor."

Future episodes will feature such guest stars as model Lily Cole, Downton Abbey's Hugh Bonneville as a pirate and ex-Coronation Street actress Suranne Jones.

The latter will appear in a story called The Doctor's Wife, written by fantasy author Neil Gaiman.

'Tease, don't tell'

For the first time this year's season is being split in two. The first seven episodes will air from 23 April, with the final block of six broadcast in the autumn.

"If you run for 13 weeks you can start to feel as though you can miss one episode and it'll be okay," Moffat said.

"We don't want that feeling. We stop for a few weeks and let you all worry about what's happening and then come back."

Moffat went on to ask journalists to avoid spoilers, saying it would be "a lot more fun for the kids" if nothing was given away. "Tease them but don't tell them," he pleaded.

And asked about plans for Doctor Who's 50th anniversary in 2013, he would only say: "Yes, there are thoughts..."
 
So...Maybe, the opening episode with the death is after the rest of the season? Maybe the rest of the season is a flashback. Can't be anything else, if we know everyone is in later episodes, but, someone really is gone forever.
 
I think you have to find a balance, if you're a showrunner who always lies then people get wise, and the best lies are always the ones sandwiched between truths.
 
I think you have to find a balance, if you're a showrunner who always lies then people get wise, and the best lies are always the ones sandwiched between truths.

I suppose it's not technically a lie. One of the main characters does die, just from some point in his future.
 
I think you have to find a balance, if you're a showrunner who always lies then people get wise, and the best lies are always the ones sandwiched between truths.

I suppose it's not technically a lie. One of the main characters does die, just from some point in his future.
But, the one quote specifically says that character really is gone forever.

Misdirection is one thing, and perfectly acceptable. Perfectly acceptable also to say something in a way that looks like one thing, but, can also be interpretted in the way you really mean.

Telling an outright lie is bad for a showrunner, writer, etc., it alienates your audience, especially when you're playing the "Guess who it is" game. JMS and JK Rowling were masters at this art, they would often sound like they were saying definitively that something was or wasn't "X", and then after it palyed out, you realized how they fooled you, by wording so carefully they had you believing something other than what they really meant.
 
Last edited:
Misdirection in order to sell and promote a series is fine I think...but yeah outright lying even it isn't intentional can turn a lot of fans off. You can lose the trust of an audience that way. I don't think Moffat is lying. I think he's selling the show.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top