He couldn't possibly be found innocent.
OJ Simpson agrees!
He could be if the jury buys his story. If they believe he accidentally drew his gun instead of his taser, the defendant claims "accident" and he goes home.
But one thing I noticed was overlooked in this trial. Why did the cop feel the need to draw his taser and shoot this guy in the back with it if he was lying on the ground and complying with orders? If he HAD drawn his taser and shot Oscar Grant with it, would that not have constituted assault and battery by the police officer? And isn't it the law that if someone dies while you are in the commission of another crime, you can be charged with that death as murder one?
Yet, they approached this like it was okay that the cop was going to taze that young man lying face down on the ground. But the tazing was unlawful, so it doesn't matter whether he intended to draw his taser or his gun. He was violating the man's rights and that man died while he did it. Murder.
I really think that we shouldn't be so quick to arm every cop with tasers. They treat the weapon like it carries no consequences and use it much more frequently than they would any other kind of weapon. They don't respect it AS a weapon. And thus, get careless and sloppy with it's use. A very dangerous habit for a police officer to fall into.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.