• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Recommendations / Help with older Trek books needed

RonG

Captain
Captain
Hi all,

I found online a lot of books I've missed throughout the years. Unfortunately, I can;t afford to get them all at once, and I wanted your help / recommendations...:confused:

My choices are:

- TOS: Brother's Keeper Trilogy

- VOY: String Theory Trilogy

- TOS - New Earth books 2-5 (I have books 1 & 6 but haven't read them)

- ENT: Kobayashi Maru and TOS: Uhura's Song (these are from a different online store and are a lot - they are offered togeher)

What's your recommendation? what should I get first?:confused:

Thanks in advance!:)
 
I would strongly recommend skipping Kobayashi Maru. It's really a pretty awful book. I haven't read any of the other ones you mentioned but for the love of all that is holy, save yourself the time of reading KM
 
String theory is pretty good. I'd recommend a read of that. But dont read them all at once. Gets a bit samey over three books
 
Hm, New Earth is okay I suppose, but it'd put it behind Uhura's Song, which is one of my favorites. Can't remember much of the Brother's Keeper trilogy, and I have to agree with AN_D_K regarding String Theory.
Kobayashi Maru - only if you're a huge Enterprise fan.
 
None of those are really all that great. String Theory is probably the best of the lot.
 
The only ones of those I've read are String Theory and Kobayashi Maru, and I would go with String Theory over Kobayashi Maru.
 
Uhura's Song. It's a total Mary Sue adventure, but of all the ones in the list I liked it the most. Interesting worldbuilding featuring giant kitties.

Kobayashi Maru (ENT) was a huge disappointment to me. All I remember about My Brother's Keeper is the terrible James "R" Kirk running gag. New Earth I remember even less of, but IIRC it was quite mediocre.

I haven't read String Theory.
 
I found String Theory to be absolutely horrid. It was one of the few times that I about didn't finish the story...

Kobayashi Maru isn't bad. It isn't great; but it isn't bad. If you're into the Enterprise relaunch, go for it, if not...meh.

New Earth is too long, plain and simple. Six books. Yikes. With everything that colony goes through, I would have just given up and called it a day. Despite some of the (correct) complaints about it—it's barely Trek-related—Challenger is the best book of the series.

I remember next to nothing about My Brother's Keeper.

Uhura's Song is one of my all-time favorite TrekLit titles. I've read that book so may times, I could almost recite it by heart. It is complete Mary Sue fiction, and has many eye-rolling moments, but it's just downright fun. I'd recommend it over the others.
 
I'm quite fond of the "My Brother's Keeper" trilogy. It not only covers the background story of Kirk and Mitchell but also of the TOS-episode "Obsession" and IIRC offers a nice spin of the difference in the Klingons' appearance between series and movies/TNG. It's a good read, perhaps lacking the universe-changing scope of recent Trek (which isn't particularly negative IMO). If you've read other novels by MJ Friedman you'll know what the expect style-wise.

New Earth... well, I worked my way through all 6 books... and book 6's definitely the best one, perhaps because it focuses more on a new crew than on Kirk et al saving the colony time and again which becomes a bit repetitive after a while (esp books 2 and 5 were quite similar in that respect). I'd recommend you read book 1 which you already own and find out if you like the premise of the series. You should definitely read "Challenger" (and perhaps get only book 5 to familiarize yourself with the setting on Belle Terre) and its sequel "Chainmail" which is still one of the best Trek books I've ever read.
 
Kobayashi Maru certainly doesn't live up to the promise of its title but there's enough good character beats in there to make it worth the read, IMO.

Plus, it sets up a few things for the pretty good Romulan War book. But it's not totally essential in that regard.

I haven't read the rest of those sadly.
 
TOS: Brother's Keeper Trilogy
Despite some chronological quibbles, I enjoyed this trilogy. I liked that Friedman approached this trilogy as a trilogy, rather than as one long book split into three (as was the norm for the Ordoverian trilogies); except for a framing sequence in each book, the three books stand alone.

String Theory Trilogy

I have this. I've never read it, though.

TOS - New Earth books 2-5 (I have books 1 & 6 but haven't read them)

I'd say the essential books are 1, 2, 5, and 6. Books 2, 4, and 5 all have the exact same plot -- something threatens the colony, Kirk and the Enterprise try to convince a bunch of recalcitrant colonists that unless they do something to save themselves they're all going to die, recalcitrant colonists don't do anything until the last freakin' minute because that would infringe upon their right to live free and unfettered of government and its agents, some people die. No, I kid you not.

Two and five are essential in a way that four is not; two is the actual settling of the colony, and five is essentially the conclusion to the story, with book six as a kind of semi-related but inessential epilogue.

ENT: Kobayashi Maru and TOS: Uhura's Song (these are from a different online store and are a lot - they are offered togeher)

I'd probably go for this one just to get Uhura's Song, which was truly awesome. :)
 
I'm quite fond of the "My Brother's Keeper" trilogy. It not only covers the background story of Kirk and Mitchell but also of the TOS-episode "Obsession" and IIRC offers a nice spin of the difference in the Klingons' appearance between series and movies/TNG. It's a good read, perhaps lacking the universe-changing scope of recent Trek (which isn't particularly negative IMO). If you've read other novels by MJ Friedman you'll know what the expect style-wise.

I appreciated Friedman's depiction of Mitchell - particularly his clever re-working of Mitchell's "walking freezer unit" line in Where No Man Has Gone Before into a non-sexist comment.
 
Aw, but I liked the casual sexism of the original series. It had a certain charm to it and kind of identified the era from which it came. How did he rework it?
 
^ Mitchell uses the term to refer to the "walking stack of books" version of Kirk:
"With all those solemn looks and officious frowns of yours, you come off like a walking freezer unit."
Kirk looked at him. "Freezer unit?"
"That's what I said," the underclassman told him, standing his ground. "If a woman sat next to you, she'd probably get frostbite."
 
None of those are really all that great. String Theory is probably the best of the lot.

That is hard to believe. I would take KM over String Theory any day.

As for the books offered by the OP; it is like you picked the battle of the suck.

Maybe, just maybe, Kirsten Beyer's book in the ST Trilogy is worth while. But I'd prolly still take KM over it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top