Re: Prime Directive: applies to all Fed Citizens as law, or just Starf
No, it suggests that he was transferred to a Starfleet facility because he is a Starfleet officer. If the arresting officer was from Starfleet, he would have said "Starfleet Security" rather than "Federation Security."
As I said in the part of my previous post you selectively editted out, the terms Federation and Starfleet are often used interchangibly.
No, they're really not.
For example "Federation starship Enterprise" Unless you mean the Enterprise isn't really in Starfleet?
It
isn't in Starfleet. You can't be
in Starfleet if you're not a person who has either enlisted or holds a commission.
It is a Starfleet ship, yes, but that doesn't identify its nationality, since "Starfleet" can be used as a generic term for any interstellar state's space force. That's why it's called a
Federation starship -- that identifies its nationality, which the term "Starfleet" does not. Same way it's meaningless to call the
Enterprise a "Navy" ship in real life -- it's meaningful to call it
United States Ship Enterprise, but there are any number of navies in the world.
By that logic, no one in the FBI would ever be involved in counter-espionage
You're suggesting that say... the CIA and FBI don't keep information from each other if it's in their interests? That's... a very ideal belief on your part.
You are shifting the goalposts now. No one ever said the FBI and CIA don't keep information from one-another, but your claim was that if anything about the Genesis Planet was classified at all, then a civilian Federation-wide law enforcement agency wouldn't be let in on it. I pointed out that this is an implausible argument, because we already have a national civilian law enforcement agency charged with protecting classified information -- not all classified information stays in the hands of the military today, and there's no reason to think it will in the future.
Starfleet doesn't have grand juries, it has courts-martial. A grand jury is by definition a civilian judicial institution.
Quark was initially arrested by Odo in "The Ascent" to be handed over to the Federation grand jury on Inferna Prime, indicating that the Bajoran government has entered into an extradition treaty with the UFP. Only later in the episode did we find out Quark was to be a witness rather than a defendant -- presumably meaning the request for his arrest was made by the Federation to the Bajorans as an intimidation tactic, perhaps to illustrate that he could face charges, too, and that Bajor would not protect him. But either way, an extradition treaty is more than enough for Quark to be subject to the Federation judicial system if he violates Federation law while in its territory.
So Quark is a Bajorian citizen now?
He doesn't have to be. He lives on a Bajoran space station, and that makes him subject to Bajoran law. If the Bajoran government receives an extradition request from the Federation for him, then they are obliged to arrest him and turn him over to the Federation by treaty.
To make a comparison to modern law: my grandfather is not a United States citizen. He is a Canadian citizen and a permanent resident of the United States; that makes him subject to U.S. law. If it were to turn out that while traveling, he had, say, violated British law, and the U.K. filed an extradition request with the U.S., then the U.S. government would have every right to arrest him and extradite him to the United Kingdom if he were found on U.S. territory. His only option to evade such arrest would be to flee to Canada or to another country and hope they would not honor any extradition requests from the U.K.
Makes sense they'd have extraditions, but it'd also make equal sense that the Ferengi government would habitually protect it's "businessmen" too.
I'm sure the Ferengi Embassy on Bajor and the Ferengi Embassy on Earth would both do everything in their power to protect Quark and his rights as a Ferengi citizen. And I'm sure that if Quark had evaded Odo and fled to Ferenginar, the Ferengi government would refuse to honor an extradition request from the Federation. But that doesn't mean there's much else they could do beyond protest and try to work out a deal with the Federation prosecutor.
But to the point, how do you know Starfleet doesn't have grand juries? If they function as the main court of the Federation
Objection. You are supposing something not in evidence.
Which is a more plausible interpretation: That the Federation operates grand juries that are called "Federation grand juries," or that Starfleet is the Federation's entire judicial system even though it is not called such, referred to as such, or in any way indicated to be such?
Well, the interference in that episode was clearly illegal. We don't know the details about the Federation Charter's non-interference directive, so we don't know when it has or has not been broken in other episodes.
Uh.. Klingon Civil War interference however indirect comes to mind. Interference in the Cardassian/Klingon War. Interference in the Romulan dissident movement, I can go on. The Federation does what it wants when it's in their interest.
Again, it's unclear what the details are of the Federation Charter's prohibition on foreign interference, and therefore it is unclear whether or not any of those particular interventions are illegal under the Federation Charter.