Is "positronic" a trade-name turned generic, like kleenex or coke--I understand that it was used in an Asimov publication of some antiquity--or does the operating principle of Soong-type androids really rely on antimatter positrons?
If the latter, why use positrons (what advantage does a particle with identical physical properties, save charge, to an electron bring), and how (might safety be an issue, is Data's brain a low-yield photon torpedo)?
I presume the former. After all, the human brain uses electrons and seems to manifest some semblance of consciousness.
If the latter, why use positrons (what advantage does a particle with identical physical properties, save charge, to an electron bring), and how (might safety be an issue, is Data's brain a low-yield photon torpedo)?
I presume the former. After all, the human brain uses electrons and seems to manifest some semblance of consciousness.