PAD can be abrasive. But he's usually also right.
Having met him a few times and emailed him I can also say he's very nice.
PAD can be abrasive. But he's usually also right.
Sorry to ask, but for somebody who just jumped into this forum...what was Scans_daily?
Same here. I haven't emailed him, but he was extremely apologetic when he interrupted a conversation with me at a con to chat with Neil Gaiman, who had walked up and joined us. Like I was going to be upset at getting to overhear a chat between those two.PAD can be abrasive. But he's usually also right.
Having met him a few times and emailed him I can also say he's very nice.
Sorry to ask, but for somebody who just jumped into this forum...what was Scans_daily?
Scans_Daily was a community on LiveJournal where people would scan in segments from a comic book, often inserting humorous commentary before or after the scans. It started off as a place to inject homoerotic interpretations of the scans as a gag, and it grew into a general comics-sharing place.
Later, people began to post larger and larger percentages of a comic, and to included detailed write-ups. As a result, it got shut down by LiveJournal; the exact details of the thing, such as whether or not writer Peter David was responsible for the shut-down, are what this thread has been about.
Same here. I haven't emailed him, but he was extremely apologetic when he interrupted a conversation with me at a con to chat with Neil Gaiman, who had walked up and joined us. Like I was going to be upset at getting to overhear a chat between those two.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.