• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Operation Annihilate vs. Puppet Masters

The Master of Tarquin Hill

Commodore
Commodore
Though I realize that the fact that this just occurred to me is in no way original, I do wonder about the nature of what must be the ongoing debate.

Did Carabatsos steal whole, or in part, from Heinlein?

What is the verdict from the TOS sages?
 
I'm hard pressed to see commonality.

Heinlein's aliens are secretive infiltrators who sneakily turn people into traitors, and the heroes have to guess who is infected and who is not. The Trek parasites just rush in openly and subdue the populance with pain, and there is no doubt who is infected and who is not. Heinlein's monsters are stirred to action by a visit from an Earth exploration vessel, in essence making humans guilty of their own suffering, while the Trek ones seem to spread on their own, without requiring the thoughtlessness of humans.

Heinlein's heroes' opponents are "recruited" people and their traitorous activities; Kirk's opponents are the creatures themselves. Heinlein's heroes try to cope amidst a hostile society, while Kirk serenely hovers over it during the search for a cure.

The basic idea of parasitic aliens is common to the two stories, but it's certainly much older than Heinlein's book. And specifically the approach where the parasites are beastly monsters to be medically removed, rather than an intelligent foe with aims and goals, is the good old version that predates the fifties.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top