I don't think I would have been any more kindly disposed towards the situation if Kirk or Picard or Sisko or Archer had done the same thing. Heck, as-is I already think at least one of Sisko's actions was perilously borderline, and Archer actually crossed the border at least once - he's not my favorite captain, but I also acknowledge that I can't fully appreciate what he went through.
For the record, I wouldn't say that what Sisko or Archer did was necessarily more or less worthy of condemnation. Granted it's easy to say from the side-lines, but I don't think, ideally (yeah, I said it) that SF captains should be acting in ways where their morality is even brought into question.
I'm not willing to give Janeway (or the writers) a pass just because the episode was the show's finale either, especially when there's such a relatively easy fix, making the original future timeline look less well-off. If we -are- supposed to cheer for Janeway's actions, I think this was pretty botched writing.
Actually, I'd like to think that leaving us debating the morality of Janeway's actions was one of the writers' intentions, but I don't have any information on that point either way.
For the record, I wouldn't say that what Sisko or Archer did was necessarily more or less worthy of condemnation. Granted it's easy to say from the side-lines, but I don't think, ideally (yeah, I said it) that SF captains should be acting in ways where their morality is even brought into question.
I'm not willing to give Janeway (or the writers) a pass just because the episode was the show's finale either, especially when there's such a relatively easy fix, making the original future timeline look less well-off. If we -are- supposed to cheer for Janeway's actions, I think this was pretty botched writing.
Actually, I'd like to think that leaving us debating the morality of Janeway's actions was one of the writers' intentions, but I don't have any information on that point either way.