So, no continuence is better is better than irritating re-design issues.DOWN WITH THE J.J.PRISE![]()
Huh.

So, no continuence is better is better than irritating re-design issues.DOWN WITH THE J.J.PRISE![]()
So, no continuence is better is better than irritating re-design issues.DOWN WITH THE J.J.PRISE![]()
Huh.![]()
THANK YOU!!!!!!!And then, you get to the flattened nacelles which would look more at home on a Klingon cruiser
The refit has just never really looked like a unified design whole to me-- not in the theaters in 1979 and not now. It's very nicely modeled, it's beautifully photographed... and the various parts don't seem all to belong to the same ship. The saucer's okay, sort of, and the secondary hull's okay (if a bit plump-looking) and the torpedo launcher is okay. Sort of. But mostly okay, so far.
And then, you get to the flattened nacelles which would look more at home on a Klingon cruiser, and the nacelle struts arrayed at a wider angle, swept and reverse-tapered for reasons not intuitively obvious, and the "why?" factor starts to kick in for me, even now. Those parts seem to belong to another ship altogether. The whole does not look to me to be all of a piece -- a problem I don't have with the JJ-prise, design-wise.
Yeah, like the new nacelles. What's with those strange wings, or that WWII propeller plane nose? Are those intuitively obvious to you?and the nacelle struts arrayed at a wider angle, swept and reverse-tapered for reasons not intuitively obvious,
I prefer my nacelles circumcised.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.