Consider the people that have been assembled:
- Bryan Fuller himself: Representative of innovation in television and storytelling
- Nicholas Meyer: Representative of Trek's literary legacy and exploration of pathos
- Rod Roddenbury: Representative of Trek's humanism and enlightenment ideals
I think I'm seeing his game - sending signals that each part of what makes up Star Trek will be respected.
Nicholas Meyer hopefully with his tendency to tell deep and literary character stories with the characters we love; replete with references to Arthur Conan Doyle, Herman Melville, William Shakespeare and C S Forrester. Rod Roddenbury hopefully bringing some of the optimism that characterised Star Trek at it's most inspiring; the idea that the universe is a natural wonder waiting to be explored and understood. And Fuller, who experimented wildly with shows like Hannibal and Pushing Daisies. I'm not trying to put these people on a pedestal, but damn if they aren't embodiements of different aspects of Star Trek that we love.
- Bryan Fuller himself: Representative of innovation in television and storytelling
- Nicholas Meyer: Representative of Trek's literary legacy and exploration of pathos
- Rod Roddenbury: Representative of Trek's humanism and enlightenment ideals
I think I'm seeing his game - sending signals that each part of what makes up Star Trek will be respected.
Nicholas Meyer hopefully with his tendency to tell deep and literary character stories with the characters we love; replete with references to Arthur Conan Doyle, Herman Melville, William Shakespeare and C S Forrester. Rod Roddenbury hopefully bringing some of the optimism that characterised Star Trek at it's most inspiring; the idea that the universe is a natural wonder waiting to be explored and understood. And Fuller, who experimented wildly with shows like Hannibal and Pushing Daisies. I'm not trying to put these people on a pedestal, but damn if they aren't embodiements of different aspects of Star Trek that we love.
Last edited: